On involute-evolute curve couple in the hyperbolic and de Sitter spaces

H. S. Abdel-Aziz; M. Khalifa Saad; A. A. Abdel-Salam

doi:10.1186/s42787-019-0023-z

Original research
Open Access
Published: 02 August 2019

On involute-evolute curve couple in the hyperbolic and de Sitter spaces

H. S. Abdel-Aziz¹,
M. Khalifa Saad^1,2 &
A. A. Abdel-Salam¹

Journal of the Egyptian Mathematical Society volume 27, Article number: 25 (2019) Cite this article

415 Accesses
Metrics details

Abstract

This paper aims at showing that Frenet apparatus of an evolute curve can be formed in terms of Frenet apparatus of its involute curve in the hyperbolic (de Sitter) space. Also, we establish relationships among Frenet frame of the considered curve couple. Finally, we defray some examples to confirm our main results.

Introduction

The idea of a string involute is due to Christian Huygens (1658), who is also known for his work in optics. He discovered involutes while trying to develop a more accurate clock [1]. The involute of a given curve is a well-known concept in Euclidean 3-space R³. It is well-known that if a curve is differentiable at each point of an open interval, a set of mutually orthogonal unit vectors can be constructed and called Frenet frame or moving frame vectors. The rates of these frame vectors along the curve define curvatures of the curves. The set, whose elements are frame vector and curvatures of a curve, is called Frenet apparatus of the curve.

It is safe to report that the many important results in the theory of the curves in R³ were initiated by G. Monge, and G. Darboux pioneered the moving frame idea (for more details see [2]). Thereafter, Frenet defined his moving frame and his special equations which play important role in mechanics and kinematics as well as in differential geometry. At the beginning of the twentieth century, A. Einstein’s theory opened a door to the use of new geometries. One of them, Minkowski space-time, which is simultaneously the geometry of special relativity and the geometry induced on each fixed tangent space of an arbitrary Lorentzian manifold, was introduced, and some of the classical differential geometry topics have been treated by the researchers. In the recent years, the theory of degenerate submanifolds has been treated by researchers and some classical differential geometry topics have been extended to Lorentz manifolds. For instance, in [3–5], the authors extended and studied spacelike involute-evolute curves in Euclidean 4-space and Minkowski space-time.

An evolute and its involute are defined in mutual pairs. The evolute and the involute of the curve pair are well known by the mathematicians especially the differential geometry scientists. The evolute of any curve is defined as the locus of the centers of curvature of the curve. The original curves are then defined as the involute of the evolute. The simplest case is that of a circle, which has only one center of curvature (its center), which is a degenerate evolute and the circle itself is the involute of this point.

Izumiya et al. defined the evolute curve in hyperbolic 2-space and found its equation. Following the works of them, we defined the evolute curve in hyperbolic 3-space and de Sitter 3-space and found its equations (see Definitions (2) and (3), and for more details, see [1, 6–10]).

In this paper, we calculate the Frenet apparatus of the evolute curve in terms of the apparatus of its involute curve in hyperbolic 2-space, hyperbolic 3-space, and de Sitter 3-space. We hope that our results can be seen as refinement and generalization of many corresponding results existing in the literature and useful in mathematical modeling and some other applications.

Preliminaries

In this section, we give the basic notions and familiar results in Lorentzian geometry which we need in this paper (for more details, see [7–12]).

Hyperbolic 2-space

Let R³={(x₁,x₂,x₃)∣x₁,x₂,x₃∈R} be a three-dimensional vector space and x=(x₁,x₂,x₃) and y=(y₁,y₂,y₃) be two vectors in R³. The pseudo-scalar product of x and y is defined by 〈x,y〉=−x₁y₁+x₂y₂+x₃y₃. (R³,〈,〉) is called a three-dimensional pseudo-Euclidean space or Minkowski 3-space. We write ${E}_{1}^{3}$ instead of (R³,〈,〉). We say that a vector x in ${E}_{1}^{3}$ is spacelike, lightlike, or timelike if 〈x,x〉>0,〈x,x〉=0 or 〈x,x〉<0, respectively. We now define spheres in ${E}_{1}^{3}$ as follows:

$$\left\{\begin{array}{l} {H}_{+}^{2}=\{x\in {E}_{1}^{3}\mid -x_{1}^{2}+x_{2}^{2}+x_{3}^{2}=-1,x_{1}\geq 1\} \\ {H}_{-}^{2}=\{x\in {E}_{1}^{3}\mid -x_{1}^{2}+x_{2}^{2}+x_{3}^{2}=-1,x_{1}\leq -1\} \\ {S}_{1}^{2}=\{x\in {E}_{1}^{3}\mid -x_{1}^{2}+x_{2}^{2}+x_{3}^{2}=1\}. \end{array}\right. $$

We call ${H}_{\pm }^{2}$ a hyperbola and ${S}_{1}^{2}$ a pseudo-sphere. Now, we discuss some basic facts of curves in hyperbolic 2-space, which are needed in the sequel.

Let $\alpha :I\longrightarrow {H}_{+}^{2}\subset {E}_{1}^{3};\quad \alpha (t)=(x_{1}(t),x_{2}(t),x_{3}(t))$ be a smooth regular curve in $ {H}_{+}^{2} (i.e.,\alpha ^{\prime }(t)\neq 0)$ for any t∈I, where I is an open interval. It is easy to show that 〈α^′(t),α^′(t)〉>0, for any t∈I. We call such a curve a spacelike curve. The norm of the vector $x\in {E}_{1}^{3}$ is defined by $\Arrowvert x\Arrowvert =\sqrt {\arrowvert \langle x,x\rangle \arrowvert }$. The arc-length of a spacelike curve α, measured from α(t₀),t₀∈I is $s(t)=\int _{t_{\circ }}^{t}\Arrowvert \alpha ^{\prime }(t)\Arrowvert dt$. Then, the parameter s is determined such that $ \lVert \dot {\alpha }(s)\rVert =1$, where $\dot {\alpha }(s)=\frac {d\alpha (s)}{ds}$. So, we say that a spacelike curve α is parameterized by arc-length, if it satisfies $\Arrowvert \dot {\alpha }(s)\Arrowvert =1$. Throughout the remainder in this paper, we denote the parameter s of α as the arc-length parameter. Let us denote $\mathbf {T} (s)=\dot {\alpha }(s)$, and we call T(s) a unit tangent vector of α at s.

For any $x=(x_{1},x_{2},x_{3}),y=(y_{1},y_{2},y_{3})\in {E}_{1}^{3}$, the pseudo-vector product of x and y is defined as follows:

$$x\wedge y=\left| \begin{array}{ccc} -e_{1} & e_{2} & e_{3} \\ x_{1} & x_{2} & x_{3} \\ y_{1} & y_{2} & y_{3} \end{array} \right| =(-(x_{2}y_{3}-x_{3}y_{2}),x_{3}y_{1}-x_{1}y_{3},x_{1}y_{2}-x_{2}y_{1}). $$

We remark that 〈x∧y,z〉=det(x y z). Hence, x∧y is pseudo-orthogonal to x,y. We now set a vector E(s)=α(s)∧T(s). By definition, we can calculate that 〈E(s),E(s)〉=1 and 〈α(s),α(s)〉=−1. We can also show that T(s)∧E(s)=−α(s) and α(s)∧E(s)=−T(s). Therefore, we have a pseudo-orthonormal frame {α(s),T(s),E(s)} along α(s). We have the following hyperbolic Frenet-Serret formula of plane curves:

$$ \left\{\begin{array}{l} \dot{\alpha}(s)=\mathbf{T}(s) \\ \dot{\mathbf{T}}(s)=\alpha(s)+\kappa_{g}(s) \mathbf{E}(s) \\ \dot{\mathbf{E}}(s)=-\kappa_{g}(s) \mathbf{T}(s), \end{array}\right. $$

(1)

or in the matrix form:

$$ \left[ \begin{array}{ccc} \dot{\alpha}(s)\\ \dot{\mathbf{T}}(s) \\ \dot{\mathbf{E}}(s) \end{array} \right]=\left[ \begin{array}{ccc} 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & \kappa_{g} \\ 0 & -\kappa_{g} & 0 \end{array} \right] \left[ \begin{array}{ccc} \alpha (s) \\ \mathbf{T}(s) \\ \mathbf{E}(s) \end{array} \right] $$

(2)

where κ_g is the geodesic curvature of the curve α in $ {H}_{+}^{2} $, which is given by

$$ \kappa_{g}(s)=det(\alpha(s)\ \mathbf{T}(s)\ \dot{\mathbf{T}}(s)). \notag $$

Hyperbolic 3-space

Let R⁴ be a four-dimensional vector space. For any x=(x₁,x₂,x₃,x₄),y=(y₁,y₂,y₃,y₄)∈R⁴, the pseudo-scalar product of x and y is defined by 〈x,y〉=−x₁y₁+x₂y₂+x₃y₃+x₄y₄. (R⁴,〈,〉) is called a Minkowski 4-space and denoted by ${E}_{1}^{4}$. We say that a vector $x\in {{E}_{1}^{4}}$ is spacelike, lightlike, or timelike if 〈x₁,x₂〉>0,〈x₁,x₂〉=0 or 〈x₁,x₂〉<0, respectively. The norm of the vector $x\in {E}_{1}^{4}$ is defiend by $\lVert x\rVert =\sqrt { \lvert \langle x,x\rangle \rvert }$. For a non-zero vector $\upsilon \in E_{1}^{4}$ and a real number c, we define a space with pseudo-normal υ by

$${S}(\upsilon,c)=\{x\in {{E}_{1}^{4}}\mid \langle x,\upsilon \rangle =c\}. $$

The space S(υ,c) is called a spacelike space, a timelike space, or a lightlike space if υ is timelike, spacelike, or lightlike, respectively.

Now, we define a hyperbolic 3-space by

$${H}_{+}^{3}(-1)=\left\{x\in {{E}_{1}^{4}}\mid \langle x,x\rangle =-1,x_{1}>0\right\}. $$

For any x=(x₁,x₂,x₃,x₄), y=(y₁,y₂,y₃,y₄) and $ z=(z_{1},z_{2},z_{3},z_{4}) \in {{E}_{1}^{4}}$, the pseudo-vector product of x, y, and z is defined as follows:

$$\begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} x\wedge y\wedge z &=&\left\vert \begin{array}{cccc} -i & j & k & l \\ x_{1} & x_{2} & x_{3} & x_{4} \\ y_{1} & y_{2} & y_{3} & y_{4} \\ z_{1} & z_{2} & z_{3} & z_{4} \end{array} \right\vert \notag \\ &=&\left(-\left\vert \begin{array}{ccc} x_{2} & x_{3} & x_{4} \\ y_{2} & y_{3} & y_{4} \\ z_{2} & z_{3} & z_{4} \end{array} \right\vert,-\left\vert \begin{array}{ccc} x_{1} & x_{3} & x_{4} \\ y_{1} & y_{3} & y_{4} \\ z_{1} & z_{3} & z_{4} \end{array} \right\vert,\left\vert \begin{array}{ccc} x_{1} & x_{2} & x_{4} \\ y_{1} & y_{2} & y_{4} \\ z_{1} & z_{2} & z_{4} \end{array} \right\vert,-\left\vert \begin{array}{ccc} x_{1} & x_{2} & x_{3} \\ y_{1} & y_{2} & y_{3} \\ z_{1} & z_{2} & z_{3} \end{array} \right\vert \right). \notag \end{array} $$

We now prepare some basic facts of curves in hyperbolic 3-space.

Let $\beta :I\longrightarrow {H}_{+}^{3}\subset {E}_{1}^{4};\quad \beta (t)=(x_{1}(t),x_{2}(t),x_{3}(t),x_{4}(t))$ be a smooth regular curve in $ {H}_{+}^{3} (i.e.,\beta ^{\prime }(t)\neq 0)$ for any t∈I where I is an open interval. So that 〈β^′(t),β^′(t)〉>0 for any t∈I. The arc-length of β measured from β(t_∘),t_∘∈I is $s(t)=\int _{t_{\circ }}^{t}\Arrowvert \beta ^{\prime }(t)\Arrowvert dt$. Then, the parameter s is determined such that $\Arrowvert \dot {\beta }(s)\Arrowvert =1$, where $\dot {\beta }(s)=\frac {d\beta (s)}{ds}$. So, we say that a spacelike curve β is parameterized by arc-length if it satisfies that $\Arrowvert \dot {\beta }(s)\Arrowvert =1$. Let us denote $\mathbf {T}(s)=\dot {\beta }(s)$, and we call T(s) a unit tangent vector of β at s.

Here, we construct the explicit differential geometry on curves in $ {H}_{+}^{3}(-1)$. Let $\beta :I\longrightarrow {H}_{+}^{3}(-1)$ be a regular curve. Since ${H}_{+}^{3}(-1)$ is a Riemannian manifold, we can reparameterize β by the arc-length. Hence, we may assume that β(s) is a unit speed curve. So, we have the tangent vector $\mathbf {T}(s)=\dot {\beta }(s)$ with ∥T∥=1. In case when $ \left \langle \dot {\mathbf {T}}(s),\dot {\mathbf {T}}(s)\right \rangle \neq -1$, then we have a unit vector

$$ \mathbf{N}(s)=\frac{\dot{\mathbf{T}}(s)-\beta (s)}{\lVert \dot{\mathbf{T}}(s)-\beta (s)\rVert }.\notag $$

Moreover, define E(s)=β(s)∧T(s)∧N(s), then we have a pseudo-orthonormal frame {β(s),T(s),N(s),E(s)} of ${E}_{1}^{4}$ along β. By standard arguments, under the assumption that $\left \langle \dot {\mathbf {T}}(s),\dot {\mathbf {T}}(s)\right \rangle \neq -1$, we have the following Frenet formula:

$$ \left\{\begin{array}{l} \dot{\beta}(s)=\mathbf{T}(s), \\ \dot{\mathbf{T}}(s)=\beta (s)+\kappa_{g}\mathbf{N}(s), \\ \dot{\mathbf{N}}(s)=-\kappa_{g}\mathbf{T}(s)+\tau_{g}\mathbf{E}(s), \\ \dot{\mathbf{E}}(s)=-\tau_{g}\mathbf{N}(s). \end{array}\right. $$

(3)

In another form:

$$ \left[ \begin{array}{c} \dot{\beta}(s) \\ \dot{\mathbf{T}}(s) \\ \dot{\mathbf{N}}(s) \\ \dot{\mathbf{E}}(s) \end{array} \right] =\left[ \begin{array}{cccc} 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & \kappa_{g} & 0 \\ 0 & -\kappa_{g} & 0 & \tau_{g} \\ 0 & 0 & -\tau_{g} & 0 \end{array} \right] \left[ \begin{array}{c} \beta (s) \\ \mathbf{T}(s) \\ \mathbf{N}(s) \\ \mathbf{E}(s) \end{array} \right] \notag $$

where

$$\begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} \kappa_{g} &=&\lVert \dot{\mathbf{T}}(s)-\beta (s)\rVert, \\\\ \tau_{g} &=&-\frac{det\left(\beta (s),\dot{\beta}(s),\ddot{\beta}(s),\dddot{\beta}(s)\right) }{(\kappa _{g}(s))^{2}} \end{array} $$

(4)

are the geodesic curvature and geodesic torsion of the curve β in ${H}_{+}^{3}(-1)$, respectively.

Since $\left \langle \dot {\mathbf {T}}(s)-\beta (s),\dot {\mathbf {T}}(s)-\beta (s)\right \rangle =\left \langle \dot {\mathbf {T}}(s),\dot {\mathbf {T}}(s)\right \rangle +1$, the condition

$$\left\langle \dot{\mathbf{T}}(s),\dot{\mathbf{T}}(s)\right\rangle \neq -1, $$

is equivalent to the condition κ_g(s)≠0. Moreover, we can show that the curve β(s) satisfies the condition κ_g(s)≡0 if and only if there exists a lightlike vector c such that β(s)−c is a geodesic. Such a curve is called an equidistant curve (see [9, 12]).

De Sitter 3-space

Let $\gamma :I\longrightarrow {S}_{1}^{3}$ be a smooth and regular spacelike curve in ${S}_{1}^{3}$. We can parameterize it by arc-lengths. Hence, we may assume that γ(s) is a unit speed curve and we have the tangent vector $\mathbf {T}(s)=\dot {\gamma }(s)$ with ∥T∥=1. In this case, we call γ a unit speed spacelike curve. If $\left \langle \dot {\mathbf {T}}(s),\dot {\mathbf {T}}(s)\right \rangle \neq 1$, then $\lVert \dot {\mathbf {T}}(s)+\gamma (s)\rVert \neq 0$, and we define the unit vector $\mathbf {N}(s)=\frac { \dot {\mathbf {T}}(s)+\gamma (s)}{\lVert \dot {\mathbf {T}}(s)+\gamma (s)\rVert }$. Moreover, define E(s)=γ(s)∧T(s)∧N(s), then we have a pseudoorthonormal frame {γ(s),T(s),N(s),E(s)} of ${E}_{1}^{4}$ along γ. By standard arguments, under the assumption that $\left \langle \dot {\mathbf {T}}(s),\dot {\mathbf {T}}(s)\right \rangle \neq 1$, we have the following Frenet-Serret type formula:

$$ \left\{\begin{array}{l} \dot{\gamma}(s)=\mathbf{T}(s) \\ \dot{\mathbf{T}}(s)=-\gamma (s)+\kappa_{g}\mathbf{N}(s) \\ \dot{\mathbf{N}}(s)=-\delta (\gamma)\kappa_{g}\mathbf{T}(s)+\tau_{g} \mathbf{E}(s) \\ \dot{\mathbf{E}}(s)=\tau_{g}\mathbf{N}(s). \end{array}\right. $$

(5)

It can be written as:

$$ \left[ \begin{array}{ccc} \dot{\gamma}(s)\\ \dot{\mathbf{T}}(s) \\ \dot{\mathbf{N}}(s) \\ \dot{\mathbf{E}}(s) \end{array} \right] =\left[ \begin{array}{cccc} 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ -1 & 0 & \kappa_{g} & 0 \\ 0 & -\delta (\gamma)\kappa_{g} & 0 & \tau_{g} \\ 0 & 0 & \tau_{g} & 0 \end{array} \right] \left[ \begin{array}{cccc} \gamma (s) \\ \mathbf{T}(s)\\ \mathbf{N}(s) \\ \mathbf{E}(s) \end{array} \right] \notag $$

where δ(γ)=sign (N(s)) (which we shall write as simply δ) and

$$ \left\{\begin{array}{l} \kappa_{g}=\lVert\dot{\mathbf{T}}(s)+\gamma (s)\rVert, \\ \\ \tau_{g}=\frac{\delta \det \left(\gamma (s),\dot{\gamma}(s),\ddot{\gamma}(s),\dddot{\gamma}(s)\right) }{(\kappa _{g}(s))^{2}}, \end{array}\right. $$

(6)

are the geodesic curvature and geodesic torsion of the curve γ in ${S}_{1}^{3}$, respectively.

Since $\left \langle \dot {\mathbf {T}}(s)+\gamma (s),\dot {\mathbf {T}}(s)+\gamma (s)\right \rangle =\left \langle \dot {\mathbf {T}}(s),\dot {\mathbf {T}}(s)\right \rangle -1$, the condition $\left \langle \dot {\mathbf {T}}(s),\dot {\mathbf {T}}(s)\right \rangle \neq 1$ is equivalent to the condition κ_g(s)≠0 (see [4]).

The Frenet apparatus of an evolute curve in hyperbolic 2-space

In this section, we introduce the Frenet apparatus of an evolute curve in terms of Frenet apparatus of its involute curve in ${H}_{+}^{2} $.

Definition 1

Let $\alpha :I\longrightarrow {H}_{+}^{2}$ be a smooth and regular spacelike curve in hyperbolic 2-space. We define the hyperbolic evolute curve of α(s) under the assumption that $\kappa _{g}^{2}(s)\neq \pm 1 $ in ${H}_{+}^{2} $ as;

$$ h_{\alpha}(s)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}(s)-1\right| }} \left(\kappa_{g}(s)\alpha(s)+\mathbf{E}(s)\right). \notag $$

We remark that h_α is located in ${H}^{2}_{+}\cup {H}_{-}^{2} $ if and only if $\kappa _{g}^{2}>1 $. If h_α is located in ${H}_{-}^{2} $, we may consider −h_α(s)instead of h_α(s)and we call α(s) an involute curve of h_α(s) (for more details, see [10]).

We denote by the Frenet apparatus of an evolute curve h_α(s) by $ \left \lbrace h_{\alpha }(s),\mathbf {T}_{h_{\alpha }}(s),\mathbf {E}_{h_{\alpha }}(s),\mathcal {K}_{h_{\alpha }}(s)\right \rbrace $.

Theorem 1

Let $\alpha (s):I\longrightarrow {H}_{+}^{2}\subset {E}_{1}^{3} $ be a unit speed spacelike involute curve in ${H}_{+}^{2} $, then the Frenet apparatus of the hyperbolic evolute curve h_α(s) are given as follows:

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} \left\{\begin{array}{l} h_{\alpha}(s)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| }}\left(\kappa_{g} \alpha(s)+\mathbf{E}(s)\right), \\ \mathbf{T}_{h_{\alpha}}(s)=\frac{-\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\left(\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}\left(\alpha(s)+\kappa_{g} \mathbf{E}(s)\right), \end{array}\right. \left\{\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{E}_{h_{\alpha}}(s)=\left(\frac{\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\kappa_{g}^{2}-1} \right)\mathbf{T}(s), \\ \mathcal{K}_{h_{\alpha}}(s)=\frac{\dot{\kappa_{g}}^{2}}{\left(\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right|\right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}. \end{array}\right. \end{array} $$

(7)

Proof

From the definition of the evolute curve in hyperbolic 2-space, we can write

$$ h_{\alpha}(s)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| }}\left(\kappa_{g} \alpha(s)+\mathbf{E}(s)\right). $$

(8)

Differentiating both sides of the previous equation with respect to s and substitute from Eq. (1), we obtain

$$\begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} \mathbf{T}_{h_{\alpha}}(s)=\frac{-\kappa_{g}\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\left(\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}\left(\kappa_{g} \alpha+\mathbf{E}\right)+\frac{1}{\sqrt{\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| }}\left(\dot{\kappa_{g}}\alpha+\kappa_{g}\mathbf{T}-\kappa_{g}\mathbf{T}\right), \end{array} $$

which can be written as

$$\begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} \mathbf{T}_{h_{\alpha}}(s)&=&\frac{-\kappa_{g}\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\left(\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}\left(\kappa_{g} \alpha+\mathbf{E}\right)+\frac{\kappa_{g}^{2}-1}{\left(\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}\left(\dot{\kappa_{g}}\alpha+\kappa_{g}\mathbf{T}-\kappa_{g}\mathbf{T}\right)\\ &=&\frac{-\kappa_{g}^{2}\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\left(\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}\alpha-\frac{\kappa_{g}\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\left(\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}\mathbf{E}+\frac{\kappa_{g}^{2}\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\left(\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}\alpha-\frac{\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\left(\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}\alpha, \end{array} $$

then, we get

$$ \mathbf{T}_{h_{\alpha}}(s)=\frac{-\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\left(\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}\alpha(s)-\frac{ \kappa_{g}\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\left(\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}\mathbf{E}(s). $$

(9)

Since $ \mathbf {E}_{h_{\alpha }}(s)=h_{\alpha }(s)\wedge \mathbf {T}_{h_{\alpha }}(s) $, we have

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} \mathbf{E}_{h_{\alpha}}(s)=\left| \begin{array}{ccc} -\alpha(s) & \mathbf{T}(s) & \mathbf{E}(s) \\ \frac{\kappa_{g}}{\sqrt{\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| }} & 0 & \frac{1}{ \sqrt{\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| }} \\ \frac{-\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\left(\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| \right) ^{\frac{3}{2}}} & 0 & \frac{-\kappa_{g}\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\left(\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}} \end{array} \right|, \end{array} $$

then, we get

$$ \mathbf{E}_{h_{\alpha}}(s)=\left(\frac{\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\kappa_{g}^{2}-1} \right)\mathbf{T}(s). \notag $$

Also, by differentiating the Eq. (9) and substitute from Eq. (1), we obtain

$$ \dot{\mathbf{T}}_{h_{\alpha}}(s)= \left\{\begin{array}{l} \left(\frac{\ddot{\kappa_{g}}-\kappa_{g}^{2}\ddot{\kappa_{g}}+3\kappa_{g}\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\left(\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right|\right)^{\frac{5}{2}} }\right) \alpha(s) +\frac{ \dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\sqrt{\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right|}}\mathbf{T}(s) \\ \\ +\left(\frac{\kappa_{g}\ddot{\kappa_{g}}-\kappa_{g}^{3}\ddot{\kappa_{g}}+3\kappa_{g}^{2}\dot{\kappa_{g}}-\kappa_{g}^{2}\dot{\kappa_{g}}^{2}+\dot{\kappa_{g}}^{2}}{\left(\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right|\right)^{ \frac{5}{2}} }\right)\mathbf{E}(s). \end{array}\right. $$

(10)

Because $ \mathcal {K}_{h_{\alpha }}=\det \left (h_{\alpha }(s) \ \mathbf {T}_{h_{\alpha }}\ \dot {\mathbf {T}}_{h_{\alpha }}\right) $, then from Eqs. (8–10), we get

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} \mathcal{K}_{h_{\alpha}}(s)=\left| \begin{array}{ccc} \frac{\kappa_{g}}{\sqrt{\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| }} & 0 & \frac{1}{ \sqrt{\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| }} \\ \frac{-\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\left(\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| \right) ^{\frac{3}{2}}} & 0 & \frac{-\kappa_{g}\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\left(\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}} \\ \frac{\ddot{\kappa_{g}}-\kappa_{g}^{2}\ddot{\kappa}_{g}+3\kappa_{g}\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\left(\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right|\right)^{\frac{5}{2}}} & \frac{\dot{\kappa_{g}} }{\sqrt{\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right|}} & \frac{\kappa_{g}\ddot{\kappa}_{g}-\kappa_{g}^{3}\ddot{\kappa}_{g}+3\kappa_{g}^{2}\dot{\kappa_{g}}-\kappa_{g}^{2}\dot{\kappa}_{g}^{2}+\dot{\kappa}^{2}_{g}}{\left(\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right|\right)^{ \frac{5}{2}} } \end{array} \right|, \end{array} $$

which can be written as:

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} \mathcal{K}_{h_{\alpha}}=&\left(\frac{\kappa_{g}}{\sqrt{\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| }}\right)\left(\frac{\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\sqrt{\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| }}\right)\left(\frac{\kappa_{g}\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\left(\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}} \right) \\ &-\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| }}\right)\left(\frac{\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\left(\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}} \right)\left(\frac{\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\sqrt{\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| }}\right)\\ =&\left(\frac{\kappa_{g}^{2}\dot{\kappa_{g}}^{2}}{\left(\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| \right)^{\frac{5}{2}}} \right)-\left(\frac{\dot{\kappa_{g}}^{2}}{\left(\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| \right)^{\frac{5}{2}}} \right)\\ =&\left(\frac{\dot{\kappa_{g}}^{2}\left(\kappa_{g}^{2} -1\right) }{\left(\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right| \right)^{\frac{5}{2}}} \right). \end{array} $$

In a simple form

$$ \mathcal{K}_{h_{\alpha}}=\frac{\dot{\kappa_{g}}^{2}}{\left(\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-1\right|\right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}. \notag $$

In the light of the above calculations, the proof is completed. □

The Frenet apparatus of an evolute curve in hyperbolic 3-space

Here, as in the case of hyperbolic 2-space, we construct the Frenet apparatus of an evolute curve using Frenet apparatus of its involute curve in the hyperbolic 3-space ${H}_{+}^{3}(-1) $ and define its equation. We start as follows:

Definition 2

For a given involute curve β in ${H}_{+}^{3}(-1) $, the hyperbolic evolute curve $h_{\beta } : I\longrightarrow {H}_{+}^{3}$ of β(s) is defined by

$$ h_{\beta}(s)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-\left(\frac{ \dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}}\right)^{2}-1\right| }}\left(\kappa_{g}\beta(s)+\mathbf{N}(s)-\frac{\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{ \kappa_{g}\tau_{g}}\mathbf{E}(s)\right), \notag $$

under the assumption that $\kappa _{g}^{2}-\left (\frac {\dot {\kappa _{g}} }{\kappa _{g}\tau _{g}}\right)^{2}> 1 $.

We remark that h_β(s) is located in ${H}^{3}_{+}(-1) $if and only if $\kappa _{g}^{2}-\left (\frac { \dot {\kappa _{g}}}{\kappa _{g}\tau _{g}}\right)^{2}> 1 $, where β(s) is an involute curve of h_β(s) (see [6]).

Now, we denote by $ \left \lbrace {h_{\beta }(s),\ \mathbf {T}_{h_{\beta }}(s),\ \mathbf {\mathbf {N}}_{h_{\beta }}(s),\ \mathbf {E} _{h_{\beta }}(s),\ \mathcal {K}_{h_{\beta }}(s),\ \mathcal {T}_{h_{\beta }}(s)} \right \rbrace $ the Frenet apparatus of h_β(s) and we formulate the following theorem.

Theorem 2

Let h_β(s)be a unit speed spacelike evolute curve of β(s), then the Frenet apparatus of h_β(s) can be expressed as:

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} \mathbf{T}_{h_{\beta}}(s)=\dot{\mu}_{1}\beta(s)+(\mu_{1}-\kappa_{g}\mu_{2})\mathbf{T} (s)+(\dot{\mu}_{2}-\tau_{g}\mu_{3})\mathbf{N}(s)+(\dot{\mu}_{3}+\tau_{g}\mu_{2})\mathbf{E}(s),\notag \end{array} $$

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} \mathbf{N}_{h_{\beta}}(s) =&\left(\left|-(\eta_{1}-\mu_{1})^{2}+\eta_{2}^{2}+(\eta_{3}-\mu_{2})^{2}+(\eta_{4}-\mu_{3})^{2}\right| \right)^{\frac{-1}{2}}(((\eta_{1}-\mu_{1})\beta(s)\\ &+\eta_{2}\mathbf{T}(s) +(\eta_{3}-\mu_{2})\mathbf{N}(s)+(\eta_{4}-\mu_{3})\mathbf{E}(s))),\notag \end{array} $$

$$ \mathcal{K}_{h_{\beta}}=\sqrt{\left|-(\eta_{1}-\mu_{1})^{2}+\eta_{2}^{2}+(\eta_{3}-\mu_{2})^{2}+(\eta_{4}-\mu_{3})^{2}\right|}, \notag $$

$$ {\begin{aligned} \mathbf{E}_{h_{\beta}}(s)=&-\frac{1}{\mathcal{K}_{\beta}}((-\mu_{2}((\mu_{1}-\kappa_{g}\mu_{2})(\eta_{4}-\mu_{3})- \eta_{2}(\dot{\mu}_{2}-\tau_{g}\mu_{3}))+\mu_{3}((\mu_{1}-\kappa_{g}\mu_{2}) (\eta_{3}-\mu_{2})\\&-\eta_{2}(\dot{\mu}_{2}-\tau_{g}\mu_{3})))\beta(s) +(\mu_{1}((\dot{\mu}_{2}-\tau_{g}\mu_{3}) (\eta_{4}-\mu_{3})- (\eta_{3}-\mu_{2})(\dot{\mu}_{3}+\tau_{g}\mu_{2}))\\&-\mu_{2}(\dot{\mu}_{1}(\eta_{4}-\mu_{3})- (\eta_{1}-\mu_{1})(\dot{\mu}_{3}+\tau_{g}\mu_{2}))+ \mu_{3}(\dot{\mu}_{1}(\eta_{3}-\mu_{2}) -(\eta_{1}-\mu_{1})(\dot{\mu}_{2}-\tau_{g}\mu_{3})))\mathbf{T}(s)\\ &-(\mu_{1}((\mu_{1}-\kappa_{g}\mu_{2})(\eta_{4}-\mu_{3})-\eta_{2}(\dot{\mu}_{3}+\tau_{g}\mu_{2}))+\mu_{3}(\dot{\mu}_{1}\eta_{2}-(\eta_{1}-\mu_{1})(\mu_{1}-\kappa_{g}\mu_{2})))\mathbf{N}(s)\\ &+(\mu_{1}((\mu_{1}-\kappa_{g}\mu_{2})(\eta_{3}-\mu_{2})-\eta_{2}(\dot{\mu}_{2}+\tau_{g}\mu_{3}))+\mu_{2}(\dot{\mu}_{1}\eta_{2}-(\eta_{1}-\mu_{1})(\mu_{1}-\kappa_{g}\mu_{2})))\mathbf{E}(s)), \end{aligned}} $$

$$ {\begin{aligned} \mathcal{T}_{h_{\beta}}(s)=&\frac{1}{\mathcal{K}_{\beta}^{2}} (\mu_{1}((\mu_{1}-\kappa_{g}\mu_{2})(\eta_{3}\zeta_{4}-\eta_{4}\zeta_{3})-(\dot{\mu}_{2}-\tau_{g}\mu_{3})(\eta_{2}\zeta_{4}-\eta_{4}\zeta_{2}) +(\dot{\mu}_{3}-\tau_{g}\mu_{2})(\eta_{2}\zeta_{3}-\eta_{3}\zeta_{2}))\\ &-\mu_{2}(\dot{\mu}_{1}(\eta_{2}\zeta_{4} -\eta_{4}\zeta_{2}) -(\mu_{1}-\kappa_{g}\mu_{2})(\eta_{1}\zeta_{4}-\eta_{4}\zeta_{1}) +(\dot{\mu}_{3}-\tau_{g}\mu_{2})(\eta_{1}\zeta_{2}-\eta_{2}\zeta_{1}))\\ &+\mu_{3}(\dot{\mu}_{1}(\eta_{2}\zeta_{3} -\eta_{3}\zeta_{2})-(\mu_{1}-\kappa_{g}\mu_{2})(\eta_{1}\zeta_{3}-\eta_{3}\zeta_{1}) +(\dot{\mu}_{2}-\tau_{g}\mu_{3})(\eta_{1}\zeta_{2}-\eta_{2}\zeta_{1}))), \end{aligned}} $$

where μ₁,μ₂,μ₃,η₁,η₂,η₃,η₄,ζ₁,ζ₂,ζ₃, and ζ₄ are smooth functions.

Proof

According to the Definition (2), we have

$$ {\begin{aligned} h_{\beta}(s)= \frac{\kappa_{g}}{\sqrt{\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-\left(\frac{ \dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}}\right)^{2}-1\right| }}\beta + \frac{1}{\sqrt{\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-\left(\frac{\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{ \kappa_{g}\tau_{g}}\right)^{2}-1\right| }}\mathbf{N} -\frac{\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}\sqrt{\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-\left(\frac{\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}} \right)^{2}-1\right| }}\mathbf{E}.\notag \end{aligned}} $$

If we denote

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} \mu_{1}&=\frac{\kappa_{g}}{\sqrt{\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-\left(\frac{ \dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}}\right)^{2}-1\right| }}, \ \ \mu_{2}= \frac{1}{\sqrt{\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-\left(\frac{\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{ \kappa_{g}\tau_{g}}\right)^{2}-1\right| }},\notag \\ \mu_{3}&=-\frac{\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}\sqrt{\left| \kappa_{g}^{2}-\left(\frac{\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}} \right)^{2}-1\right| }}, \end{array} $$

(11)

then, the evolute curve h_β(s) can take the form

$$ h_{\beta}(s)=\mu_{1}\beta(s) +\mu_{2}\mathbf{N}(s)+\mu_{3}\mathbf{E}(s). $$

(12)

Differentiating both sides of the previous equation with respect to s and substitute from Eq. (3), we obtain

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} \mathbf{T}_{h_{\beta}}(s)=&\dot{\mu}_{1}\beta(s)+\mu_{1}\dot{\beta}(s)+\dot{\mu}_{2}\mathbf{N}(s)+\mu_{2}\dot{\mathbf{N}}(s)+\dot{\mu}_{3}\mathbf{E}(s)+\mu_{3}\dot{\mathbf{E}}(s) \notag \\ =&\dot{\mu}_{1}\beta(s)+\mu_{1}\mathbf{T}(s)+\dot{\mu}_{2}\mathbf{N} (s)+\mu_{2}(-\kappa_{g}\mathbf{T}(s)+\tau_{g}\mathbf{E}(s))\\ &+\dot{\mu}_{3} \mathbf{E}(s)-\mu_{3}(\tau_{g}\mathbf{N}(s)) \notag \\ =&\dot{\mu}_{1}\beta(s)+(\mu_{1}-\kappa_{g}\mu_{2})\mathbf{T} (s)+(\dot{\mu}_{2}-\tau_{g}\mu_{3})\mathbf{N}(s)\\ &+(\dot{\mu}_{3}+\tau_{g}\mu_{2})\mathbf{E}(s). \end{array} $$

(13)

Following the differentiating of Eq. (13), we get

$$ \dot{\mathbf{T}}_{h_{\beta}}(s)= \left\{\begin{array}{l} (\ddot{\mu}_{1}+\mu_{1}-\kappa_{g}\mu_{2})\beta(s) +(2\dot{\mu}_{1}-\dot{\kappa_{g}}\mu_{2}-2\kappa_{g}\dot{\mu}_{2}+\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}\mu_{3})\mathbf{T}(s) \\ +(\kappa_{g}\mu_{1}-\kappa_{g}^{2}\mu_{2}+\ddot{\mu}_{2}-\dot{\tau_{g}}\mu_{3}-2\tau_{g}\dot{\mu}_{3}-\tau_{g}^{2}\mu_{2}) \mathbf{N}(s) \\ +(\tau_{g}\dot{\mu}_{2}-\tau_{g}^{2}\mu_{3}+\ddot{\mu}_{3}+\dot{\tau_{g}}\mu_{2}+\tau_{g}\dot{\mu}_{2})\mathbf{E}(s), \end{array}\right. $$

(14)

which can be written in a simple form

$$ \dot{\mathbf{T}}_{h_{\beta}}(s)=\eta_{1}\beta(s)+\eta_{2}\mathbf{T} (s)+\eta_{3}\mathbf{N}(s)+\eta_{4}\mathbf{E}(s), $$

(15)

where

$$ \left\{\begin{array}{l} \eta_{1}=(\ddot{\mu}_{1}+\mu_{1}-\kappa_{g}\mu_{2}) \\ \eta_{2}=(2\dot{\mu}_{1}-\dot{\kappa_{g}}\mu_{2}-2\kappa_{g}\dot{\mu}_{2}+\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}\mu_{3}) \\ \eta_{3}=(\kappa_{g}\mu_{1}-\kappa_{g}^{2}\mu_{2}+\ddot{\mu}_{2}-\dot{\tau_{g}}\mu_{3}-2\tau_{g}\dot{\mu}_{3}-\tau_{g}^{2}\mu_{2}) \\ \eta_{4}=(\tau_{g}\dot{\mu}_{2}-\tau_{g}^{2}\mu_{3}+\ddot{\mu}_{3}+\dot{\tau_{g}}\mu_{2}+\tau_{g}\dot{\mu}_{2}). \end{array}\right. $$

(16)

Thus, from Eqs. (12) and (14), we obtain

$$ \mathbf{N}_{h_{\beta}}(s)=\frac{\dot{\mathbf{T}}_{\beta}(s)-h_{\beta}(s)}{\lVert \dot{\mathbf{T}}_{\beta}(s)-h_{\beta}(s)\rVert}, $$

Following the above, we can write

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} \mathbf{N}_{h_{\beta}}(s)& =\left(\left|-(\eta_{1}-\mu_{1})^{2}+\eta_{2}^{2}+(\eta_{3}-\mu_{2})^{2}+(\eta_{4}-\mu_{3})^{2}\right| \right)^{\frac{-1}{2}}(((\eta_{1}-\mu_{1})\beta(s)\\ &\quad+\eta_{2}\mathbf{T}(s) +(\eta_{3}-\mu_{2})\mathbf{N}(s)+(\eta_{4}-\mu_{3})\mathbf{E}(s))). \end{array} $$

(17)

Also, from Eqs. (4) and (17), we obtain

$$ \mathcal{K}_{h_{\beta}}=\sqrt{\left|-(\eta_{1}-\mu_{1})^{2}+\eta_{2}^{2}+(\eta_{3}-\mu_{2})^{2}+(\eta_{4}-\mu_{3})^{2}\right|}. $$

Therefore, by differentiating (14) and using (3), we can obtain

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} \dddot{h_{\beta}}(s)=&\ (\dddot{\mu}_{1}+3\dot{\mu}_{1}-2\dot{\kappa_{g}}\mu_{2}-3\kappa_{g}\dot{\mu}_{2}+\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}\mu_{3})\beta(s)+(3\ddot{\mu}_{1}+\mu_{1}-\kappa_{g}\mu_{2}-\ddot{\kappa_{g}}\mu_{2}\\ & -3\dot{\kappa_{g}}\dot{\mu}_{2}-3\kappa_{g}\ddot{\mu}_{2}+\dot{\kappa_{g}}\tau_{g}\mu_{3}+2\kappa_{g}\dot{\tau_{g}}\mu_{3}+3\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}\dot{\mu}_{3})\mathbf{T}(s) +(3\kappa_{g}\dot{\mu}_{1}-3\kappa_{g}\dot{\kappa_{g}}\mu_{2}\\ &-3\kappa_{g}^{2}\dot{\mu}_{2}+\dot{\kappa_{g}}\mu_{1}+\kappa_{g}^{2}\tau_{g}\mu_{3}-3\tau_{g}\dot{\tau_{g}}\mu_{2}-2\tau_{g}^{2}\dot{\mu}_{2}+\dddot{\mu}_{2}-\ddot{\tau_{g}}\mu_{3}-3\dot{\tau_{g}}\dot{\mu}_{3}-3\tau_{g}\ddot{\mu}_{3}\\ &-\tau_{g}^{2}\dot{\mu}_{2}-\tau_{g}^{2}\mu_{3})\mathbf{N}(s) +(\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}\mu_{1}-\kappa_{g}^{2}\tau_{g}\mu_{2}-\tau_{g}^{3} \mu_{2}+3\tau_{g}\ddot{\mu}_{2}-3\tau_{g}\dot{\tau_{g}}\mu_{3}+\dddot{\mu}_{3}\\ &-3\tau_{g}^{2}\dot{\mu}_{3}+3\dot{\tau_{g}}\dot{\mu}_{2}+\ddot{\tau_{g}}\mu_{2})\mathbf{E}(s), \end{array} $$

(18)

which can be written as:

$$ \dddot{h_{\beta}}(s)=\zeta_{1}\beta(s)+\zeta_{2}\mathbf{T} (s)+\zeta_{3}\mathbf{N}(s)+\zeta_{4}\mathbf{E}(s), $$

(19)

Noting that

$$ \left\{\begin{array}{ll} \zeta_{1}=&(\dddot{\mu}_{1}+3\dot{\mu}_{1}-2\dot{\kappa_{g}}\mu_{2}-3\kappa_{g}\dot{\mu}_{2}+\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}\mu_{3}) \\ \zeta_{2}=&(3\ddot{\mu}_{1}+\mu_{1}-\kappa_{g}\mu_{2}-\ddot{\kappa_{g}}\mu_{2} -3\dot{\kappa_{g}}\dot{\mu}_{2}-3\kappa_{g}\ddot{\mu}_{2}\\ &+\dot{\kappa_{g}}\tau_{g}\mu_{3}+2\kappa_{g}\dot{\tau_{g}}\mu_{3}+3\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}\dot{\mu}_{3}) \\ \zeta_{3}=&(3\kappa_{g}\dot{\mu}_{1} -3\kappa_{g}\dot{\kappa_{g}}\mu_{2}-3\kappa_{g}^{2}\dot{\mu}_{2}+\dot{\kappa_{g}}\mu_{1}+\kappa_{g}^{2}\tau_{g}\mu_{3}\\&-3\tau_{g}\dot{\tau_{g}}\mu_{2} -2\tau_{g}^{2}\dot{\mu}_{2}+\dddot{\mu}_{2}-\ddot{\tau_{g}}\mu_{3}-3\dot{\tau_{g}}\dot{\mu}_{3}-3\tau_{g}\ddot{\mu}_{3}\\ &-\tau_{g}^{2}\dot{\mu}_{2} -\tau_{g}^{2}\mu_{3}) \\ \zeta_{4}=&(\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}\mu_{1}-\kappa_{g}^{2}\tau_{g}\mu_{2}-\tau_{g}^{3} \mu_{2}+3\tau_{g}\ddot{\mu}_{2}-3\tau_{g}\dot{\tau_{g}}\mu_{3}\\ &+\dddot{\mu}_{3} -3\tau_{g}^{2}\dot{\mu}_{3}+3\dot{\tau_{g}}\dot{\mu}_{2}+\ddot{\tau_{g}}\mu_{2}). \end{array}\right. $$

(20)

From Eqs. (4), (12), (13), (15), and (19), the torsion $\mathcal {T}_{\beta } $ is given by

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} \mathcal{T}_{h_{\beta}}(s)=-\frac{1}{\mathcal{K}_{h_{\beta}}^{2}}\left| \begin{array}{cccc} \mu_{1} & 0 & \mu_{2} & \mu_{3} \\ \dot{\mu}_{1} & (\mu_{1}-\kappa_{g}\mu_{2}) & (\dot{\mu}_{2}-\tau_{g}\mu_{3}) & (\dot{\mu}_{3}+\tau_{g}\mu_{2}) \\ \eta_{1} & \eta_{2} & \eta_{3} & \eta_{4} \\ \zeta_{1} & \zeta_{2} & \zeta_{3} & \zeta_{4} \end{array} \right|, \notag \end{array} $$

or

$$ {\begin{aligned} \mathcal{T}_{h_{\beta}}(s)=&\frac{1}{\mathcal{K}_{h_{\beta}}^{2}} (\mu_{1}((\mu_{1}-\kappa_{g}\mu_{2})(\eta_{3}\zeta_{4}-\eta_{4}\zeta_{3})-(\dot{\mu}_{2}-\tau_{g}\mu_{3})(\eta_{2}\zeta_{4}-\eta_{4}\zeta_{2}) +(\dot{\mu}_{3}-\tau_{g}\mu_{2})(\eta_{2}\zeta_{3}-\eta_{3}\zeta_{2}))\\ &-\mu_{2}(\dot{\mu}_{1}(\eta_{2}\zeta_{4} -\eta_{4}\zeta_{2}) -(\mu_{1}-\kappa_{g}\mu_{2})(\eta_{1}\zeta_{4}-\eta_{4}\zeta_{1}) +(\dot{\mu}_{3}-\tau_{g}\mu_{2})(\eta_{1}\zeta_{2}-\eta_{2}\zeta_{1}))\\ &+\mu_{3}(\dot{\mu}_{1}(\eta_{2}\zeta_{3} -\eta_{3}\zeta_{2})-(\mu_{1}-\kappa_{g}\mu_{2})(\eta_{1}\zeta_{3}-\eta_{3}\zeta_{1}) +(\dot{\mu}_{2}-\tau_{g}\mu_{3})(\eta_{1}\zeta_{2}-\eta_{2}\zeta_{1}))). \end{aligned}} $$

(21)

In addition, from (12), (13), and (17), the vector $\mathbf {E}_{h_{\beta }}(s)=h_{\beta }(s)\wedge \mathbf {T}_{h_{\beta }}(s) \wedge \mathbf {N}_{h_{\beta }}(s)$ is computed as:

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} \mathbf{E}_{h_{\beta}}(s)&=\frac{1}{\mathcal{K}_{h_{\beta}}}\left| \begin{array}{cccc} -\beta(s) & \mathbf{T}(s) & \mathbf{N}(s) & \mathbf{E}(s) \\ \mu_{1} & 0 & \mu_{2} & \mu_{3} \\ \dot{\mu}_{1} & (\mu_{1}-\kappa_{g}\mu_{2}) & (\dot{\mu}_{2}-\tau_{g}\mu_{3}) & (\dot{\mu}_{3}+\tau_{g}\mu_{2}) \\ (\eta_{1}-\mu_{1}) & \eta_{2} & (\eta_{3}-\mu_{2}) & (\eta_{4}-\mu_{3}) \end{array} \right|, \notag \end{array} $$

which can be taken in the form

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} \mathbf{E}_{h_{\beta}}(s) =&-\frac{1}{\mathcal{K}_{h_{\beta}}}\left| \begin{array}{ccc} 0 & \mu_{2} & \mu_{3} \\ (\mu_{1}-\kappa_{g}\mu_{2}) & (\dot{\mu}_{2}-\tau_{g}\mu_{3}) & (\dot{\mu}_{3}+\tau_{g}\mu_{2}) \\ \eta_{2} & (\eta_{3}-\mu_{2}) & (\eta_{4}-\mu_{3}) \end{array} \right|\beta(s) \notag \end{array} $$

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} & \qquad-\frac{1}{\mathcal{K}_{h_{\beta}}}\left| \begin{array}{ccc} \mu_{1} & \mu_{2} & \mu_{3} \\ \dot{\mu}_{1} & (\dot{\mu}_{2}-\tau_{g}\mu_{3}) & (\dot{\mu}_{3}+\tau_{g}\mu_{2}) \\ (\eta_{1}-\mu_{1}) & (\eta_{3}-\mu_{2}) & (\eta_{4}-\mu_{3}) \end{array} \right|\mathbf{T}(s) \notag \end{array} $$

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} & +\frac{1}{\mathcal{K}_{h_{\beta}}}\left| \begin{array}{ccc} \mu_{1} & 0 & \mu_{3} \\ \dot{\mu}_{1} & (\mu_{1}-\kappa_{g}\mu_{2}) & (\dot{\mu}_{3}+\tau_{g}\mu_{2}) \\ (\eta_{1}-\mu_{1}) & \eta_{2} & (\eta_{4}-\mu_{3}) \end{array} \right|\mathbf{N}(s) \notag \end{array} $$

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} &-\frac{1}{\mathcal{K}_{h_{\beta}}}\left| \begin{array}{cccc} \mu_{1} & 0 & \mu_{2} & \\ \dot{\mu}_{1} & (\mu_{1}-\kappa_{g}\mu_{2}) & (\dot{\mu}_{2}-\tau_{g}\mu_{3}) & \\ (\eta_{1}-\mu_{1}) & \eta_{2} & (\eta_{3}-\mu_{2}) & \end{array} \right|\mathbf{E}(s), \notag \end{array} $$

In the light of the previous computations, the proof is completed. □

The Frenet apparatus of an evolute curve in de Sitter 3-space

Similar to the case of the hyperbolic evolute curve, we introduce the definition Frenet apparatus of an evolute curve in the three-dimensional de Sitter space.

Definition 3

Let γbe an involute curve in ${S}_{1}^{3} $, then the de Sitter evolute curve $d_{\gamma } : I\longrightarrow {S}_{1}^{3}$ of γ(s) is expressed as

$$ d_{\gamma}(s)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\left| \left(\frac{\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{ \kappa_{g}\tau_{g}}\right)^{2}-\kappa_{g}^{2}+1\right| }}\left(\kappa_{g}\gamma(s)+\mathbf{N}(s)+\frac{\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{ \kappa_{g}\tau_{g}}\mathbf{E}(s)\right) \notag $$

under the assumption that $\kappa _{g}^{2}-\left (\frac {\dot {\kappa _{g}} }{\kappa _{g}\tau _{g}}\right)^{2}< 1 $.

We remark that d_γ(s) is located in ${S}^{3}_{1} $ if and only if $\kappa _{g}^{2}-\left (\frac { \dot {\kappa _{g}}}{\kappa _{g}\tau _{g}}\right)^{2}< 1 $, where γ(s) is an involute curve of d_γ (see [1]).

We refer to $ \left \lbrace d_{\gamma }(s),\ \mathbf {T}_{d_{\gamma }}(s),\ \mathbf {N}_{d_{\gamma }}(s),\ \mathbf {E} _{d_{\gamma }}(s),\ \mathcal {K}_{\gamma }(s),\ \mathcal {T}_{d_{\gamma }}(s)\right \rbrace $ as Frenet apparatus of the evolute curve in ${S}^{3}_{1} $.

Theorem 3

For a given spacelike evolute curve d_γ(s) of γ(s), the Frenet apparatus are introduced as:

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} \mathbf{T}_{d_{\gamma}}(s)=\dot{\lambda}_{1}\gamma(s)+(\lambda_{1}-\delta\kappa_{g}\lambda_{2}) \mathbf{T}(s)+(\dot{\lambda}_{2} +\tau_{g}\lambda_{3})\mathbf{N} (s)+(\dot{\lambda}_{3} +\tau_{g}\lambda_{2})\mathbf{E}(s),\notag \end{array} $$

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} \mathbf{N}_{d_{\gamma}}(s) =&\left(\left|-(\xi_{1}+\lambda_{1})^{2}+\xi_{2}^{2}+(\xi_{3}+ \lambda_{2})^{2}+(\xi_{4}+\lambda_{3})^{2}\right| \right)^{\frac{-1}{2}}(((\xi_{1}+\lambda_{1})\gamma(s)\notag\\ &+\xi_{2}\mathbf{T}(s) +(\xi_{3}+\lambda_{2})\mathbf{N}(s)+(\xi_{4}+\lambda_{3})\mathbf{E}(s))),\notag \end{array} $$

$$ \mathcal{K}_{d_{\gamma}}=\sqrt{\left|-(\xi_{1}+\lambda_{1})^{2}+\xi_{2}^{2}+(\xi_{3}+\lambda_{2})^{2}+(\xi_{4}+\lambda_{3})^{2}\right|}, \notag $$

$$ {\begin{aligned} \mathbf{E}_{d_{\gamma}}(s)=&-\frac{1}{\mathcal{K}_{d_{\gamma}}}((-\lambda_{2}((\lambda_{1}-\kappa_{g}\lambda_{2})(\xi_{4}+\lambda_{3})- \xi_{2}(\dot{\lambda}_{2}+\tau_{g}\lambda_{3}))+\lambda_{3}((\lambda_{1}-\kappa_{g}\lambda_{2}) (\xi_{3}+\lambda_{2})\\&-\xi_{2}(\dot{\lambda}_{2}+\tau_{g}\lambda_{3})))\gamma(s) +(\lambda_{1}((\dot{\lambda}_{2}+\tau_{g}\lambda_{3}) (\xi_{4}+\lambda_{3})- (\xi_{3}+\lambda_{2})(\dot{\lambda}_{3}+\tau_{g}\lambda_{2}))\\&-\lambda_{2}(\dot{\lambda}_{1}(\xi_{4}+\lambda_{3})- (\xi_{1}+\lambda_{1})(\dot{\lambda}_{3}+\tau_{g}\lambda_{2}))+ \lambda_{3}(\dot{\lambda}_{1}(\xi_{3}+\lambda_{2}) -(\xi_{1}+\lambda_{1})(\dot{\lambda}_{2}+\tau_{g}\lambda_{3})))\mathbf{T}(s)\\ &-(\lambda_{1}((\lambda_{1}-\kappa_{g}\lambda_{2})(\xi_{4}+\lambda_{3})-\xi_{2}(\dot{\lambda}_{3}+\tau_{g}\lambda_{2}))+\lambda_{3}(\dot{\lambda}_{1}\xi_{2}-(\xi_{1}+\lambda_{1})(\lambda_{1}-\kappa_{g}\lambda_{2})))\mathbf{N}(s)\\ &+(\lambda_{1}((\lambda_{1}-\kappa_{g}\lambda_{2})(\xi_{3}+\lambda_{2})-\xi_{2}(\dot{\lambda}_{2}+\tau_{g}\lambda_{3}))+\lambda_{2}(\dot{\lambda}_{1}\xi_{2}-(\xi_{1}+\lambda_{1})(\lambda_{1}-\kappa_{g}\lambda_{2})))\mathbf{E}(s)), \end{aligned}} $$

$$ {\begin{aligned} \mathcal{T}_{d_{\gamma}}(s)=&\frac{1}{\mathcal{K}_{d_{\gamma}}^{2}} (\lambda_{1}((\lambda_{1}-\kappa_{g}\lambda_{2})(\xi_{3}B_{4}-\xi_{4}B_{3})-(\dot{\lambda}_{2}+\tau_{g}\lambda_{3})(\xi_{2}B_{4}-\xi_{4}B_{2}) +(\dot{\lambda}_{3}+\tau_{g}\lambda_{2})(\xi_{2}B_{3}-\xi_{3}B_{2}))\notag\\ &-\lambda_{2}(\dot{\lambda}_{1}(\xi_{2}B_{4} -\xi_{4}B_{2}) -(\lambda_{1}-\kappa_{g}\lambda_{2})(\xi_{1}B_{4}-\xi_{4}B_{1}) +(\dot{\lambda}_{3}+\tau_{g}\lambda_{2})(\xi_{1}B_{2}-\xi_{2}B_{1}))\notag\\ &+\lambda_{3}(\dot{\lambda}_{1}(\xi_{2}B_{3} -\xi_{3}B_{2})-(\lambda_{1}-\kappa_{g}\lambda_{2})(\xi_{1}B_{3}-\xi_{3}B_{1}) +(\dot{\lambda}_{2}+\tau_{g}\lambda_{3})(\xi_{1}B_{2}-\xi_{2}B_{1}))),\notag \end{aligned}} $$

where the functions λ₁,λ₂,λ₃,ξ₁,ξ₂,ξ₃,ξ₄,B₁,B₂,B₃, and B₄ being smooth functions.

Proof

From the definition of an evolute curve in de Sitter 3-space, we have

$$ {\begin{aligned} d_{\gamma}(s)= \frac{\kappa_{g}}{\sqrt{\left|\left(\frac{\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{ \kappa_{g}\tau_{g}}\right)^{2}- \kappa_{g}^{2}+1\right| }}\gamma +\frac{ 1}{\sqrt{\left|\left(\frac{\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}} \right)^{2}- \kappa_{g}^{2}+1\right| }}\mathbf{N} -\frac{\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}\sqrt{\left|\left(\frac{\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}}\right)^{2}- \kappa_{g}^{2}+1\right| }}\mathbf{E}. \end{aligned}} $$

(22)

If we denote by

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} \lambda_{1}&=\frac{\kappa_{g}}{\sqrt{\left|\left(\frac{\dot{\kappa_{g}} }{\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}}\right)^{2}- \kappa_{g}^{2}+1\right| }},\ \ \lambda_{2}= \frac{1}{\sqrt{\left|\left(\frac{\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}} \right)^{2}- \kappa_{g}^{2}+1\right| }}, \notag\\ \lambda_{3}&=-\frac{\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}\sqrt{ \left|\left(\frac{\dot{\kappa_{g}}}{\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}}\right)^{2}- \kappa_{g}^{2}+1\right| }}, \end{array} $$

(23)

then (22) can be written as

$$ d_{\gamma}(s)=\lambda_{1}\gamma(s) +\lambda_{2}\mathbf{N}(s)+\lambda_{3}\mathbf{E }(s). $$

(24)

Differentiating both sides of (24), and using (5), we get

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} \mathbf{T}_{d_{\gamma}}(s)&=\dot{\lambda}_{1}\gamma(s)+\lambda_{1}\dot{\gamma}(s)+\dot{\lambda}_{2}\mathbf{N} (s)+\lambda_{2}\dot{\mathbf{N}}(s)+\dot{\lambda}_{3}\mathbf{E} (s)+\lambda_{3}\dot{\mathbf{E}}(s) \notag \\ &=\dot{\lambda}_{1}\gamma(s)+\lambda_{1}\mathbf{T}(s)+\dot{\lambda}_{2}\mathbf{N}(s)+\lambda_{2}(-\delta\kappa_{g}\mathbf{T}(s)+\tau_{g} \mathbf{E}(s))\\ &\quad+\dot{\lambda}_{3}\mathbf{E}(s)+\lambda_{3}(\tau_{g} \mathbf{N}(s)) \notag \\ &=\dot{\lambda}_{1}\gamma(s)+(\lambda_{1}-\delta\kappa_{g}\lambda_{2}) \mathbf{T}(s)+(\dot{\lambda}_{2} +\tau_{g}\lambda_{3})\mathbf{N} (s)\\ &\quad+(\dot{\lambda}_{3} +\tau_{g}\lambda_{2})\mathbf{E}(s), \end{array} $$

(25)

which gives by differentiating

$$ \dot{\mathbf{T}}_{d_{\gamma}}(s)= \left\{\begin{array}{l} (\ddot{\lambda}_{1}-\lambda_{1}+\delta\kappa_{g}\lambda_{2})\gamma(s) +(2\dot{\lambda}_{1}-\delta\dot{\kappa_{g}}\lambda_{2}-2\delta\kappa_{g}\dot{\lambda}_{2}-\delta\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}\lambda_{3})\mathbf{T}(s) \\ +(\kappa_{g}\lambda_{1}-\delta\kappa_{g}^{2}\lambda_{2}+\ddot{\lambda}_{2}+\dot{\tau}_{g}\lambda_{3}+2\tau_{g}\dot{\lambda}_{3}+\tau_{g}^{2}\lambda_{2})\mathbf{N}(s) \\ +(\tau_{g}\dot{\lambda}_{2}+\tau_{g}^{2}\lambda_{3}+\ddot{\lambda}_{3}+\dot{\tau}_{g}\lambda_{2}+\tau_{g}\dot{\lambda}_{2})\mathbf{E}(s). \end{array}\right. $$

(26)

In another form, (26) is written

$$ \dot{\mathbf{T}}_{d_{\gamma}}(s)=\xi_{1}\gamma(s)+\xi_{2}\mathbf{T} (s)+\xi_{3}\mathbf{N}(s)+\xi_{4}\mathbf{E}(s), $$

(27)

where

$$ \left\{\begin{array}{l} \xi_{1}= (\ddot{\lambda}_{1}-\lambda_{1}+\delta\kappa_{g}\lambda_{2}) \\ \xi_{2}=(2\dot{\lambda}_{1}-\delta\dot{\kappa_{g}}\lambda_{2}-2\delta\kappa_{g}\dot{\lambda}_{2}-\delta\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}\lambda_{3}) \\ \xi_{3}=(\kappa_{g}\lambda_{1}-\delta\kappa_{g}^{2}\lambda_{2}+\ddot{\lambda}_{2}+\dot{\tau}_{g}\lambda_{3}+2\tau_{g}\dot{\lambda}_{3}+\tau_{g}^{2}\lambda_{2}) \\ \xi_{4}=(\tau_{g}\dot{\lambda}_{2}+\tau_{g}^{2}\lambda_{3}+\ddot{\lambda}_{3}+\dot{\tau}_{g}\lambda_{2}+\tau_{g}\dot{\lambda}_{2}). \end{array}\right. $$

Thus, from Eqs. (6), (24), and (27), we obtain

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} \mathbf{N}_{d_{\gamma}}(s) =&\left(\left|-(\xi_{1}+\lambda_{1})^{2}+\xi_{2}^{2}+(\xi_{3}+ \lambda_{2})^{2}+(\xi_{4}+\lambda_{3})^{2}\right| \right)^{\frac{-1}{2}}(((\xi_{1}+\lambda_{1})\gamma(s)\notag\\ &+\xi_{2}\mathbf{T}(s) +(\xi_{3}+\lambda_{2})\mathbf{N}(s)+(\xi_{4}+\lambda_{3})\mathbf{E}(s))), \end{array} $$

(28)

and

$$ \mathcal{K}_{d_{\gamma}}=\sqrt{\left|-(\xi_{1}+\lambda_{1})^{2}+\xi_{2}^{2}+(\xi_{3}+\lambda_{2})^{2}+(\xi_{4}+\lambda_{3})^{2}\right|}. \notag $$

Moreover, by differentiating Eq. (26) with respect to s, one can obtain

$$ {}\begin{aligned} \dddot{d_{\gamma}}(s)=&\ (\dddot{\lambda}_{1}-3\dot{\lambda}_{1}+2\delta\dot{\kappa_{g}}\lambda_{2}+3\delta\kappa_{g}\dot{\lambda}_{2}+\delta\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}\lambda_{3})\gamma(s)+(3\ddot{\lambda}_{1}-\lambda_{1}+\delta\kappa_{g}\lambda_{2}\\ &-\delta\ddot{\kappa_{g}}\lambda_{2}-3\delta\dot{\kappa_{g}}\dot{\lambda}_{2}-3\delta\kappa_{g}\ddot{\lambda}_{2}-\delta\dot{\kappa_{g}}\tau_{g}\lambda_{3}-\delta\kappa_{g}\dot{\tau_{g}}\lambda_{3}-3\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}\dot{\lambda}_{3}-\delta\kappa_{g}^{2}\lambda_{1}\\ &+\delta\kappa_{g}^{3}\lambda_{2}-\delta\kappa_{g}\tau^{2}_{g}\lambda_{2})\mathbf{T}(s)+(3\kappa_{g}\dot{\lambda}_{1}-3\delta\kappa_{g}\dot{\kappa_{g}}\lambda_{2} -3\delta\kappa_{g}^{2}\dot{\lambda}_{2}+\dot{\kappa}_{g}\lambda_{1}\\ &-\delta\kappa_{g}^{2}\tau_{g}\lambda_{3}+3\tau_{g}\dot{\tau_{g}}\lambda_{2}+3\tau_{g}^{2}\dot{\lambda}_{2}+\dddot{\lambda}_{2}+\ddot{\tau_{g}}\lambda_{3} +3\dot{\tau_{g}}\dot{\lambda}_{3}+\tau_{g}\ddot{\lambda}_{3}+\tau_{g}^{3}\lambda_{3}\\ &+2\dot{\tau_{g}}\ddot{\lambda}_{3})\mathbf{N}(s) +(\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}\lambda_{1}-\delta\kappa_{g}^{2}\tau_{g}\lambda_{2}+ \tau_{g}^{3}\lambda_{2}+3\tau_{g}\ddot{\lambda}_{2}+3\tau_{g}\dot{\tau_{g}}\lambda_{3}+\dddot{\lambda}_{3}\\ &+3\tau_{g}^{2}\dot{\lambda}_{3}+3\dot{\tau_{g}}\dot{\lambda}_{2}+\ddot{\tau_{g}}\lambda_{2})\mathbf{E}(s), \end{aligned} $$

(29)

which in abbreviated form

$$ \dddot{d_{\gamma}}(s)=B_{1}\gamma(s)+B_{2}\mathbf{T} (s)+B_{3}\mathbf{N}(s)+B_{4}\mathbf{E}(s), $$

(30)

where

$$ \left\{\begin{array}{ll} B_{1}&=(\dddot{\lambda}_{1}-3\dot{\lambda}_{1}+2\delta\dot{\kappa_{g}}\lambda_{2}+3\delta\kappa_{g}\dot{\lambda}_{2}+\delta\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}\lambda_{3}) \\ B_{2}&=(3\ddot{\lambda}_{1}-\lambda_{1}+\delta\kappa_{g}\lambda_{2}-\delta\ddot{\kappa_{g}}\lambda_{2}-3\delta\dot{\kappa_{g}}\dot{\lambda}_{2}-3\delta\kappa_{g}\ddot{\lambda}_{2} -\delta\dot{\kappa_{g}}\tau_{g}\lambda_{3}\\ &-\delta\kappa_{g}\dot{\tau_{g}}\lambda_{3}-3\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}\dot{\lambda}_{3}-\delta\kappa_{g}^{2}\lambda_{1}+\delta\kappa_{g}^{3}\lambda_{2}-\delta\kappa_{g}\tau^{2}_{g}\lambda_{2}) \\ B_{3}&=(3\kappa_{g}\dot{\lambda}_{1}-3\delta\kappa_{g}\dot{\kappa_{g}}\lambda_{2} -3\delta\kappa_{g}^{2}\dot{\lambda}_{2} +\dot{\kappa}_{g}\lambda_{1}-\delta\kappa_{g}^{2}\tau_{g}\lambda_{3}+3\tau_{g}\dot{\tau_{g}}\lambda_{2}\\ &+3\tau_{g}^{2}\dot{\lambda}_{2}+\dddot{\lambda}_{2}+\ddot{\tau_{g}}\lambda_{3}+3\dot{\tau_{g}}\dot{\lambda}_{3}+\tau_{g}\ddot{\lambda}_{3}+\tau_{g}^{3}\lambda_{3}+2\dot{\tau_{g}}\ddot{\lambda}_{3}) \\ B_{4}&=(\kappa_{g}\tau_{g}\lambda_{1}-\delta\kappa_{g}^{2}\tau_{g}\lambda_{2}+ \tau_{g}^{3}\lambda_{2}+3\tau_{g}\ddot{\lambda}_{2}+3\tau_{g}\dot{\tau_{g}}\lambda_{3}+\dddot{\lambda}_{3}+3\tau_{g}^{2}\dot{\lambda}_{3}\\ &+3\dot{\tau_{g}}\dot{\lambda}_{2}+\ddot{\tau_{g}}\lambda_{2}). \end{array}\right. $$

(31)

Now, after using (24), (25), (27), and (30), the torsion $\mathcal {T}_{d_{\gamma }} $ of the evolute curve d_γ(s) is obtained

$$ {\begin{aligned} \mathcal{T}_{d_{\gamma}}(s)=&\frac{1}{\mathcal{K}_{d_{\gamma}}^{2}} (\lambda_{1}((\lambda_{1}-\kappa_{g}\lambda_{2})(\xi_{3}B_{4}-\xi_{4}B_{3})-(\dot{\lambda}_{2}+\tau_{g}\lambda_{3})(\xi_{2}B_{4}-\xi_{4}B_{2}) +(\dot{\lambda}_{3}+\tau_{g}\lambda_{2})(\xi_{2}B_{3}-\xi_{3}B_{2}))\\ &-\lambda_{2}(\dot{\lambda}_{1}(\xi_{2}B_{4} -\xi_{4}B_{2}) -(\lambda_{1}-\kappa_{g}\lambda_{2})(\xi_{1}B_{4}-\xi_{4}B_{1}) +(\dot{\lambda}_{3}+\tau_{g}\lambda_{2})(\xi_{1}B_{2}-\xi_{2}B_{1}))\\ &+\lambda_{3}(\dot{\lambda}_{1}(\xi_{2}B_{3} -\xi_{3}B_{2})-(\lambda_{1}-\kappa_{g}\lambda_{2})(\xi_{1}B_{3}-\xi_{3}B_{1}) +(\dot{\lambda}_{2}+\tau_{g}\lambda_{3})(\xi_{1}B_{2}-\xi_{2}B_{1}))). \end{aligned}} $$

(32)

The only vector remaining from Frenet apparatus is the binormal vector E_γ(s), which is given directly by

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} \mathbf{E}_{d_{\gamma}}(s) =&-\frac{1}{\mathcal{K}_{d_{\gamma}}}\left| \begin{array}{ccc} 0 & \lambda_{2} & \lambda_{3} \\ (\lambda_{1}-\kappa_{g}\lambda_{2}) & (\dot{\lambda}_{2}+\tau_{g}\lambda_{3}) & (\dot{\lambda}_{3}+\tau_{g}\lambda_{2}) \\ \xi_{2} & (\xi_{3}+\lambda_{2}) & (\xi_{4}+\lambda_{3}) \end{array} \right|\gamma(s) \notag \end{array} $$

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} &\qquad \qquad-\frac{1}{\mathcal{K}_{d_{\gamma}}}\left| \begin{array}{ccc} \lambda_{1} & \lambda_{2} & \lambda_{3} \\ \dot{\lambda}_{1} & (\dot{\lambda}_{2}+\tau_{g}\lambda_{3}) & (\dot{\lambda}_{3}+\tau_{g}\lambda_{2}) \\ (\xi_{1}+\lambda_{1}) & (\xi_{3}+\lambda_{2}) & (\xi_{4}+\lambda_{3}) \end{array} \right|\mathbf{T}(s) \notag \end{array} $$

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} & \qquad \qquad+\frac{1}{\mathcal{K}_{d_{\gamma}}}\left| \begin{array}{ccc} \lambda_{1} & 0 & \lambda_{3} \\ \dot{\lambda}_{1} & (\lambda_{1}-\kappa_{g}\lambda_{2}) & (\dot{\lambda}_{3}+\tau_{g}\lambda_{2}) \\ (\xi_{1}+\lambda_{1}) & \xi_{2} & (\xi_{4}+\lambda_{3}) \end{array} \right|\mathbf{N}(s) \notag \end{array} $$

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} &\qquad \qquad-\frac{1}{\mathcal{K}_{d_{\gamma}}}\left| \begin{array}{cccc} \lambda_{1} & 0 & \lambda_{2} & \\ \dot{\lambda}_{1} & (\lambda_{1}-\kappa_{g}\lambda_{2}) & (\dot{\lambda}_{2}+\tau_{g}\lambda_{3}) & \\ (\xi_{1}+\lambda_{1}) & \xi_{2} & (\xi_{3}+\lambda_{2}) & \end{array} \right|\mathbf{E}(s), \notag \end{array} $$

Thus, the theorem has been proven. □

Examples

In this section, to support the theoretical results of this paper, we construct two examples of an evolute curve in the two- and three-dimensional hyperbolic spaces, then we calculate its Frenet apparatus using Frenet apparatus of its involute curve.

Example 1

Consider the general helix curve α in ${H}_{+}^{2}(-1)$, where

$$ \alpha(s)=\left(\frac{s}{\sqrt{2}}, \sin\left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}s\right), \cos\left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}s\right)\right). $$

(33)

Firstly, we compute the Frenet frame, the curvature and the torsion of the curve α. For this, from Eq. (33), the tangent vector of the curve α is given by

$$ \mathbf{T}(s)=\dot{\alpha}(s)=\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \cos\left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}s\right),-\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}\sin\left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} s\right)\right). $$

(34)

And from (33) and (34), we get

$$\begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} \alpha(s) \wedge \mathbf{T}(s)=\left| \begin{array}{ccc} -i & j & k \\ \frac{s}{\sqrt{2}} & \sin\left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}s\right) & \cos\left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}s\right) \\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}\cos\left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}s\right) & -\sqrt{ \frac{3}{2}}\sin\left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}s\right) \end{array} \right|, \end{array} $$

(35)

which enable us to obtain

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} \mathbf{E}(s)=&\left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \right)i +\left(\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}s\sin\left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}s\right)+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\cos\left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}s\right)\right)j\\ &+\left(\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}s\cos\left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}s\right)-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\sin\left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}s\right)\right)k; \end{array} $$

(36)

the curvature of the curve α(s) is given as follows:

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} \kappa_{g}(s)=&-\frac{s}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\frac{3}{2}\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}\cos^{2}\left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}s\right)+\frac{3}{2}\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}\sin^{2}\left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}s\right)\right)\\ &+\frac{3}{2\sqrt{2}}\left(\sin\left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}s\right)\cos\left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}s\right) -\sin\left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}s\right)\cos\left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}s\right)\right), \end{array} $$

which takes the simple form

$$ \kappa_{g}(s)=-\frac{\sqrt{27}}{4}s. $$

Thus, from Theorem (1), the Frenet apparatus of the evolute curve h_α of α(s) (see Figs. 1 and 2 ) are expressed respectively, by

$$ h_{\alpha}(s)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\lvert27 s^{2}-16\rvert}} \left\{\begin{array}{l} \left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}(4-3s^{2}),\frac{4}{\sqrt{2}}\cos\left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}s\right)- \sqrt{3}s \sin\left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}s\right)\right. \\ \left.,-\frac{4}{\sqrt{2}}\sin\left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}s\right)-\sqrt{3}s \cos\left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2 }}s\right)\right), \end{array}\right. $$

$$ \mathbf{T}_{h_{\alpha}}(s)=\frac{6\sqrt{3}}{\lvert27 s^{2}-16\rvert^{\frac{3}{2}}} \left\{\begin{array}{l} \left(-5\sqrt{2}s,(9s^{2}-2)\sin\left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}s\right)-3\sqrt{6} s \cos\left(\sqrt{ \frac{3}{2}}s\right) \right.\\,\left.(9s^{2}-2)\cos\left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}s\right)+3\sqrt{6} s \sin\left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}s\right)\right), \end{array}\right. $$

$$ \mathbf{E}_{h_{\alpha}}(s)=\frac{-12\sqrt{3}}{\lvert27 s^{2}-16\rvert}\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}\cos\left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}s\right),-\sqrt{\frac{ 3}{2}}\sin\left(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}s\right)\right), $$

and

$$ \mathcal{K}_{h_{\alpha}}(s)=\frac{27}{\lvert27 s^{2}-16\rvert^{\frac{3}{2}}}. $$

Example 2

Let β be a general helix in ${H}_{+}^{3}(-1)$, where

$$ \beta(s)=\left(\sqrt{2}\cosh(s),\sqrt{2}\sinh(s),\sin(s),\cos(s)\right). $$

(37)

From (37), the tangent vector of the curve β is given by

$$ \mathbf{T}(s)=\left(\sqrt{2}\sinh(s),\sqrt{2}\cosh(s),\cos(s),- \sin(s)\right), $$

(38)

which gives by differentiating

$$ \dot{\mathbf{T}}(s)=\left(\sqrt{2}\cosh(s),\sqrt{2}\sinh(s),-\sin(s),-\cos(s)\right). $$

(39)

From Eqs. (37) and (39), we get

$$ \mathbf{N}(s)=\frac{\dot{\mathbf{T}}(s)-\beta(s)}{\Arrowvert \dot{\mathbf{T}}(s)-\beta(s) \Arrowvert}=\left(0,0,-\sin(s),-\cos(s)\right), $$

(40)

and

$$ \kappa_{g}(s)=\Arrowvert \dot{\mathbf{T}}(s)-\beta(s) \Arrowvert=2. \notag $$

Also, we get

$$ \mathbf{E}(s)=\left(\sqrt{2}\sinh(s),\sqrt{2}\cosh(s),-2\cos(s),2\sin(s)\right). $$

Using the differentiation of Eq. (37) three times with respect to s to obtain

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} \det(\beta;\dot{\beta};\ddot{\beta};\dddot{\beta})=&\sqrt{2}\cosh(s)[ -\sqrt{2}\cosh(s)-\cos(s)(\sqrt{2}\sin(s)\sinh(s)\\ &+\sqrt{2}\cos(s)\cosh(s)) -\sin(s)(-\sqrt{2}\cos(s)\sinh(s)\\ &+\sqrt{2}\sin(s)\cosh(s))] -\sqrt{2}\sinh(s)[ -\sqrt{2}\sinh(s)\\ &-\cos(s)(\sqrt{2}\sin(s)\cosh(s)+\sqrt{2}\cos(s)\sinh(s))\\ &-\sin(s)(-\sqrt{2}\cos(s)\cosh(s)+\sqrt{2}\sin(s)\sinh(s)]\\ &+\sin(s)[ \sqrt{2}\sinh(s)(\sqrt{2}\sin(s)\sinh(s)+\sqrt{2}\cos(s)\cosh(s))\\ &-\sqrt{2}\cosh(s)(\sqrt{2}\sin(s)\cosh(s)+\sqrt{2}\cos(s)\sinh(s))\\ &-2\sin(s))] -\cos(s)[ \sqrt{2}\sinh(s)(-\sqrt{2}\cos(s)\sinh(s)\\ &+\sqrt{2}\sin(s)\cosh(s)) -\sqrt{2}\cosh(s)(- \sqrt{2}\cos(s)\cosh(s)\\ &+\sqrt{2}\sin(s)\sinh(s))+2\cos(s))], \end{array} $$

then, we get

$$ \tau_{g}(s)=-\frac{\det({\beta,\dot{\beta},\ddot{\beta}, \dddot{\beta}})}{\kappa_{g}^{2}}=2. \notag $$

From Theorem (2) and Eqs. (11), (16) and (20), the Frenet apparatus of the evolute curve h_β of β(s) are respectively, expressed by

$$ h_{\beta}(s)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\left(2\sqrt{2}\cosh(s),2\sqrt{2} \sinh(s),\sin(s),\cos(s)\right), $$

$$ \left\{\begin{array}{l} \mu_{1}=\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}},\mu_{2}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}, \mu_{3}=0, \\ \eta_{1}=\eta_{2}=\eta_{4}=0,\ \ \ \eta_{3}=\frac{-4}{3}, \\ \zeta_{1}=\zeta_{2}=\zeta_{3}=0,\ \ \ \zeta_{4}=\frac{-8}{\sqrt{3}}, \end{array}\right. $$

$$\begin{array}{*{20}l} \mathbf{T}_{h_{\beta}}(s) &=\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}\left(\sqrt{2}\sinh(s),\sqrt{2}\cosh(s),-2\cos(s),2\sin(s)\right),\\ \mathbf{N}_{h_{\beta}}(s) &=\frac{-1}{\sqrt{5}}\left(-2\sinh(s),-2\cosh(s),(-2\sqrt{2}+5)\sin(s),(-2\sqrt{2}+5)\cos(s)\right),\\ \mathbf{E}_{h_{\beta}}(s) &=\frac{-16}{3\sqrt{5}}\left(\sqrt{2}\sinh(s),\sqrt{2}\cosh(s),\cos(s),-\sin(s)\right), \end{array} $$

and

$$ \mathcal{K}_{h_{\beta}}(s) =\sqrt{\frac{5}{3}},\ \ \ \mathcal{T}_{h_{\beta}}(s)=0. $$

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

1
Bilici, M., Çaliş, M.: Some new notes on the involutes of the timelike curves in Minkowski 3-Space. Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sci. 6, 2019–2030 (2011).
MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
2
Grabiner, J. V.: A History of Mathematics. Wiley, New York (1968).
Google Scholar
3
Özyilmaz, E., Yilmaz, S.: Involute-Evolute curve couples in the Euclidean 4-space. Int. J. Open Probl. Compt. Math. 2(2), 168–174 (2009).
MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
4
Sato, T.: Pseudo-spherical evolutes of curves on a spacelike surface in three dimensional Lorentz-Minkowski space. J. Geom. 103, 319–331 (2012).
MathSciNet Article Google Scholar
5
Turgut, M., Yilmaz, S.: On the Frenet frame and a characterization of space-like involute-evolute curve couple in Minkowski space-time. Int. Math. Forum. 16, 793–801 (2008).
MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
6
Abdel-Aziz, H. S., Saad, M. K., Abdel-salam, A. A.: Some geometric invariants of pseudo-spherical evolutes in the hyperbolic 3-space. Comput. Mater. Contin. 57(3), 389–415 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
7
Hayashi, R., Izumiya, S., Sato, T.: Duals of curves in hyperbolic space. Note Mat. 33, 97–106 (2013).
MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
8
Boyer, C.: A History of Mathematics. Wiley, New York (1968).
Google Scholar
9
Hayashi, R., Izumiya, S., Sato, T.: Focal surfaces and evolutes of curves in hyperbolic space. Commun. Korean Math. Soc. 32, 147–163 (2017).
MathSciNet Article Google Scholar
10
Izumiya, S., He pei, D., Sano, T., Torii, E.: Evolutes of hyperbolic plane curves. Acta Math. Sin. 20(3), 543–550 (2004).
MathSciNet Article Google Scholar
11
Izumiya, S., Nabarro, C., de jesus, A.: Horospherical and hyperbolic dual surfaces of space-like curves in de sitter space. J. Singularities. 16, 180–193 (2017).
MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
12
Liu, H.: Curves in three dimensional Riemannian space forms. Results Math. 66(3), 469–480 (2014).
MathSciNet Article Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to referees for the useful suggestions and remarks for the revised version.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Affiliations

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Sohag University, Naser Street, Sohag, 82524, Egypt
H. S. Abdel-Aziz, M. Khalifa Saad & A. A. Abdel-Salam
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science,, Islamic University of Madinah, Madinah, 170, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
M. Khalifa Saad

Authors

H. S. Abdel-Aziz
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
M. Khalifa Saad
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
A. A. Abdel-Salam
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Khalifa Saad.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abdel-Aziz, H., Saad, M. & Abdel-Salam, A. On involute-evolute curve couple in the hyperbolic and de Sitter spaces. J Egypt Math Soc 27, 25 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42787-019-0023-z

Download citation

Received: 22 March 2019
Accepted: 26 June 2019
Published: 02 August 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42787-019-0023-z

Keywords

Frenet frames
Involute-evolute curves
Hyperbolic space

MSC

53A25
53C50