 Original research
 Open access
 Published:
Testing exponentiality against renewal new better than used in Laplace transform order: applications in reliability
Journal of the Egyptian Mathematical Society volume 27, Article number: 49 (2019)
Abstract
In this paper, a new class of life distribution is proposed, named renewal new better than used in Laplace transform order (RNBUL). The test statistic for testing exponentiality versus (RNBUL) based on Ustatistic is proposed. Pitman’s asymptotic efficiencies of the test and Pitman’s asymptotic relative efficiencies (PARE) are calculated. The percentiles of this test statistic are tabulated, and the powers of this test are estimated for some famous alternatives distributions in reliability such as Weibull, linear failure rate (LFR), and Gamma distributions. The problem regarding the rightcensored data is also handled. Finally, some applications to elucidate the usefulness of the proposed test in reliability analysis are discussed.
Introduction and motivation
It is known that the theory of reliability is a branch of statistical technology that deals with general regularities. The importance of reliability appears in its dealing with the length of human beings, organisms’ structures, materials, etc. This theory is widely used in biological, engineering and medicine sciences. The reliability of effective origins has been considered by the works that participated in the reliability theory by [1, 2]. The statisticians and reliability analysts have used classifications of life distributions—based on some aspects of aging—to model survival data. The aging concepts function is to describe how a population of units or systems improves or deteriorates with age.
Aging properties is the means to define the life distribution classes. The exponential distribution is one of the most important aspects of such classifications, and it is always a member of each class. The notion of aging has great importance in many reliability analyses. On the other hand, many statistics have been developed for testing exponentiality against different aging alternatives.
The main classes of life distributional are based on new better than used NBU, new better than used failure rate NBUFR, new better than average failure rate NBAFR, new better than used renewal failure rate NBURFR, new better than renewal used NBRU, and exponentially better than used in Laplace transform order EBUL. Many researchers have introduced testing exponentiality against some classes of life distributions. For testing exponentiality versus NBU class, see [3]. A new class of life distributions named NBUCL has introduced by [4]. The classes NBAFR, NBARFR, NBURFR, and RNBRUE have proposed by [5,6,7,8], respectively.
Renewal classes
Consider a device (system or component) with lifetime T and continuous life distribution F(t), is put on the operation. When the failure occurs, the device will be replaced by a sequence of mutually independent devices. The spare devices are independent of the first device and identically distributed with the same life distributions F(t). In the long run, the remaining life distribution of the system under operation at time t is given by stationary renewal distribution as follows:
where \( {\mu}_F=\mu =\underset{0}{\overset{\infty }{\int }}\overline{F}(u) du \).The corresponding renewal survival function is
The NRBU, RNBU, NRBUE, and HNRBUE classes of life distributions have introduced by [10], and the relation between them has been studied. Testing exponentiality versus NRBU based on TTTtransform has been investigated by [11]. A new test statistic for testing exponentiality against RNBU class of life distribution based on Ustatistic is studied by [12].
Definition 1
If X is a random variable with survival function \( \overline{F}(x) \), then X is said to have renewal new better (worth) than used property, denoted by RNBU (RNWU), if
Now, a new class of life distributions called renewal new better than used in Laplace transform order has been defined by [13].
Definition 2
X is said to be renewal new better than used in Laplace transform order (RNBUL) if:
Testing exponentiality against RNBUL
In this section, we test the null hypotheses H_{0} : F is exponential with mean μ against H_{1} : F belongs to RNBUL and not exponential.
The following lemma is essential for the development of our test statistic.
Lemma 2.1.
Let X be RNBUL random variable with distribution function F, then
where
Proof.
Since F belongs to RNBUL, then from Definition 2 and Integrating both sides with respect to t over [0, ∞), gives
setting
Therefore,
Then,
Similarly,
Then,
Substituting (2.3) and (2.4) in (2.2), we get (2.1). This completes the proof.
Empirical test statistic for RNBUL
Let X_{1}, X_{2}, X_{n} be a random sample from a population with a distribution function F ∈ RNBUL class. The measure of departure from exponentiality δ(s) is determined from the previous lemma, where
Note that under H_{0} : δ(s) = 0, and H_{1} : δ(s) > 0.Let \( \hat{\delta}(s) \) be the empirical estimate of δ(s), where
To make the test scaleinvariant under H_{0},we use \( \hat{\Delta }(s)=\frac{\hat{\delta}(s)}{{\overline{X}}^2} \), where \( \overline{X}=\frac{1}{n}\sum \limits_{i=1}^n{X}_i \) is the sample mean. Then,
Setting
and defining the symmetric kernel
where the summation is over all arrangements of X_{1}, X_{2}, X_{n}, then \( \hat{\delta}(s) \) is equivalent to Ustatistic
The following theorem summarizes the asymptotic properties of the test.
Theorem 2.1

(i)
\( As\ n\to \infty, \sqrt{n}\left[\hat{\Delta }(s)\delta (s)\right] \)is asymptotically normal with mean zero and variance

(ii)
Under H_{0} the variance reduced to
Proof:
Using standard Ustatistics theory, see [14], and by direct calculations, we can find the mean and the variance as follows:
Where η(X) = η_{1}(X) + η_{2}(X),
and
Therefore,
and Eq. (2.8) is deduced.
Under H_{0}, the mean μ_{0} and the variance σ_{0}^{2} are given by
Then, (2.9) is obtained.
The Pitman asymptotic efficiency
To access the quality of the test, Pitman asymptotic efficiencies (PAE’s) are computed and compared with some other tests for the following alternative:
 i.
The Weibull family:
$$ {\overline{F}}_1(x)={e}^{{x}^{\theta }},\kern0.5em x\ge 0,\theta \ge 1. $$  ii.
The linear failure rate family:
$$ {\overline{F}}_2(x)={e}^{x\frac{\theta }{2}{x}^2},x\ge 0,\theta \ge 0. $$  iii.
The Makeham family:
$$ {\overline{F}}_3(x)={e}^{\left[x\theta \left(x+{e}^{x}+1\right)\right]},x\ge 0,\theta \ge 0. $$
Note that for θ = 1, F_{1} goes to exponential distribution and for θ = 0, F_{2} and F_{3} reduce to the exponential distributions. The PAE is defined by
when s = 2, this leads to
and \( \mathrm{PAE}\left[\hat{\Delta }(2),\mathrm{Makeham}\right]=0.172, \) where σ_{0}(2) = 0.121716.The Pitman asymptotic relative efficiency (PARE) of our test \( \hat{\Delta }(s) \) comparing to δ_{1}, δ_{2}, δ_{3}, and δ_{4} which were studied by [6, 8, 15, 16], respectively, is calculated where
We can see from Table 1 that our test statistic \( \hat{\Delta }(s) \) for RNBUL is more efficient than the other four cases.
Monte Carlo null distribution critical values
In this section, we have simulated the upper percentile points for 90th, 95th, 98th, and 99th based on 5000 simulated samples of sizes n = 5(5)50,11 from the standard exponential distribution by using MATHEMATICA 10.
It can be noticed from Table 2 and Fig. 1 that the critical values are increasing as confidence levels increase and decrease as the sample size increases
Power estimates of the test \( \hat{\Delta }(s) \)
The power of the statistic \( \hat{\Delta }(s) \) will be carried out using significant level α = 0.05 with appropriate parameter values of θ at n = 10, 20, and 30 for 3 frequently used distributions such as Weibull, linear failure rate, and Gamma distributions based on 5000 simulated samples tabulated in Table 3.
From Table 3, we see that our test \( \hat{\Delta }(s) \) has very good power for all alternatives.
Testing for censored data
A test statistic is proposed to test H_{0} versus H_{1} in the case of randomly rightcensored (RRC) data in many practical experiments; the censored data are the only information available in a lifetesting model or in a clinical study where patients may be lost (censored) before the completion of a study. This experimental situation can formally be modeled as follows: suppose n units are put on test, and X_{1}, X_{2}, …, X_{n} denote their truelifetime which are independent, identically distributed (i.i.d.) according to continuous life distribution F. Let Y_{1}, Y_{2}, …, Y_{n} be (i.i.d.) according to continuous life distribution G. Xs and Ys are assumed to be independent. In the RRC model, we observe the pairs (Z_{j}, δ_{j}), j = 1, 2, …, n where Z_{j} = min(X_{j}, Y_{j}) and
Let Z_{(0)} = 0 < Z_{(1)} < Z_{(2)} < … < Z_{(n)} denote the ordered Zs and δ_{(j)} is the δ_{j} corresponding to Z_{(j)}. Using censored data (Z_{j}, δ_{j}), j = 1, 2, …, n [17]. proposed the productlimit estimator,
Now, for testing H_{0} : δ(s) = 0 against H_{1} : δ(s) > 0, using randomly rightcensored data, we propose the following test statistic
For computational purposes, (6.1) may be rewritten as
where
and
Table 4 below gives the critical values percentiles of \( {\hat{\Delta }}_c(s) \) test for sample size n = 5(5)30(10), 81, 86.
It can be noticed from Table 4 and Fig. 2 that the critical values are increasing as confidence levels increase and decrease as the sample size increases
Power estimates of the test \( {\hat{\Delta }}_c(s) \)
The power of the statistic \( {\hat{\Delta }}_c(s) \) is considered at the significant level α = 0.05 with suitable parameter values of θ at n = 10, 20, and 30 for some of the most commonly used distributions such as Weibull and linear failure rate distributions based on 5000 simulated samples tabulated in Table 5.
From Table 5, we see that our test \( {\hat{\Delta }}_c(s) \) has good power for all alternatives.
Some applications
In this section, we apply the test on some datasets to elucidate the applications of the RNBUL in both noncensored data and censored data at 95% confidence level.
Complete data
Dataset #1
Consider the dataset given in [18] and have been used in [19]. This dataset gives the times between arrivals of 25 customers at a facility. In this case, we get \( \hat{\Delta }(s)=0.088924 \)greater than the critical value of Table 2. Hence, we reject the null hypothesis H_{0} and accept H_{1} which states that the data have RNBUL property.
Dataset #2
Consider the dataset given in [20] which represents failure times in hours, for a specific type of electrical insulation in an experiment in which the insulation was subjected to a continuously increasing voltage stress, then we get\( \hat{\Delta }(s)=0.0242465 \) which is less than the critical value of Table 2. Hence, we accept the null hypothesis H_{0}.
Censored data
Dataset #3
Consider the dataset in [21]. These data represent 81 survival times of patients of melanoma. Out of these, 46 represents the whole times (noncensored data). We get \( {\hat{\Delta }}_c(s)=1.17837\times {10}^{87} \) which is less than the critical value of Table 4 at 95% upper percentile. Hence, we accept the null hypothesis H_{0}.
Dataset #4
Consider the dataset given in [22] for lung cancer patients. These data consist of 86 survival times (in months) with 22 rightcensored. In this case, we get \( {\hat{\Delta }}_c(s)=4.18907\times {10}^{85} \)which is less than the critical value of Table 4 at 95% upper percentile. Hence, we accept the null hypothesis H_{0}.
Availability of data and materials
All the data in the manuscript are public.
Abbreviations
 EBUL:

Exponential better than used in Laplace transform order
 LFR:

Linear failure rate
 NBAFR:

New better than average failure rate
 NBARFR:

New better than average renewal failure rate
 NBRU:

New better than renewal used
 NBU:

New better than used
 NBUCL:

New better than used in increasing convex in Laplace transform order
 NBURFR:

New better than used renewal failure rate
 PARE:

Pitman’s asymptotic relative efficiencies
 RNBRUE:

Renewal new better than renewal used in expectation
 RNBUL:

Renewal new better than used in Laplace transform order
References
Barlow, R.E., Marshall, A.W., Proschan, F.: Properties of probability distributions with monotone hazard rate. Ann Math Stat. 34(2), 375–389 (1963)
Bryson, M.C., Siddiqui, M.: Some criteria for aging. J Am Stat Assoc. 64(328), 1472–1483 (1969)
Ahmed, I.: A class of statistics useful in testing increasing failure rate average and new beter than used life distribution. J Statist Plant Inf. 41, 141–149 (1994)
Mahmoud, M.A.W., Diab, L. S and Radi, D. M, A Nonparametric Test for Testing NBUCL Class of life distributions with Applications. IOSR J Math, 2019. 15(1): p. 1521.
Abouammoh, A., Ahmed, A.: On renewal failure rate classes of life distributions. Stat Prob Lett. 14(3), 211–217 (1992)
Mahmoud, M.A.W., Alim, N.A.A.: On testing exponentiality against NBARFR life distribution. Statistica. 62(4), 619–631 (2007)
Mahmoud, M., Alim, N.A.: A goodness of fit approach for Testing NBUFR (NWUFR) and NBAFR (NWAFR) properties. Int J Rel Appl. 9(2), 125–140 (2008)
Abdel Aziz, A.: On testing exponentiality against RNBRUE alternatives. Appl Math Sci. 35, 1725–1736 (2007)
Barlow, R. and F. Proschan, Statistical theory of Reliability and life testing. To begin with. Silver Spring, MD, 1981.
Abouammoh, A., Ahmad, R., Khalique, A.: On new renewal better than used classes of life distributions. Stat Prob Lett. 48(2), 189–194 (2000)
Abouammoh, A. and A. Khalique, On tests of new renewal better than used classes of life distributions. Parisan. Samikkha, 1998. 5: p. 2132.
Mahmoud, M., ElArishy, S., Diab, L.: Testing renewal new better than used life distributions based on Utest. Appl Math Model. 29(8), 784–796 (2005)
M. A. W. Mahmoud, L.S.D.a.D.M.R., Testing Exponentiality Against RNBUL Class of Life Distribution Based on Goodness of Fit. J. Stat. Appl. Pro. , 2019. 8(1): p. 5766.
Lee, A.J.: Ustatistics: Theory and Practice. Marcel Dekker, New York (1990)
Kango, A.: Testing for new is better than used. Comm Statist Theory Methods. 12, 311–321 (1993)
Mugdadi, A., Ahmad, I.A.: Moment inequalities derived from comparing life with its equilibrium form. J Stat Plan Inference. 134(2), 303–317 (2005)
Kaplan, E.L., Meier, P.: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 53(282), 457–481 (1958)
Grubbs, F.E.: Approximate fiducial bounds on reliability for the two parameter negative exponential distribution. Technometrics. 13(4), 873–876 (1971)
Shapiro, S., Goodness of Fit Tests in the Exponential Distribution Theory Methods and Applications. Balakrishnan, N.; Basu, AP Editors. 1995, Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam.
Lawless, J.F., Statistical models and methods for lifetime data. Vol. 362. 2011: John Wiley & Sons.
Susarla, V. and J. Van Ryzin, Empirical Bayes estimation of a distribution (survival) function from right censored observations. Ann Stat, 1978: p. 740754.
Pena, A.: Goodness of fit tests with censored data (2002)
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed equally to this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Mahmoud, M.A.W., Diab, L.S. & Radi, D.M. Testing exponentiality against renewal new better than used in Laplace transform order: applications in reliability. J Egypt Math Soc 27, 49 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s4278701900447
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s4278701900447
Keywords
 Classes of life distributions
 RNBUL
 Testing Exponentiality
 U test
 Pitman asymptotic efficiency
 Censored data