 Original research
 Open Access
 Published:
The T–R {Y} power series family of probability distributions
Journal of the Egyptian Mathematical Society volume 28, Article number: 29 (2020)
Abstract
A new family of univariate probability distributions called the T − R {Y} power series family of probability distributions is introduced in this paper by compounding the T − R {Y} family of distributions and the power series family of discrete distributions. A treatment of the general mathematical properties of the new family is carried out and some subfamilies of the new family are specified to depict the broadness of the new family. The maximum likelihood method of parameter estimation is suggested for the estimation of the parameters of the new family of distributions. A special member of the new family called the Gumbel–Weibull–{logistic}–Poisson (GUWELOP) distribution is defined and found to exhibit both unimodal and bimodal shapes. The GUWELOG distribution is further applied to a real multimodal data set to buttress its applicability.
Introduction
Within the last two centuries, various methods for generating continuous univariate distributions have been put forward in the literature. These methods include the method based on differential equations (Pearson [1]; Burr [2]), method based on transformation (Johnson [3]), method based on quantiles (Tukey [4]; Aldeni et al. [5]), method for generating skewed distributions (Azzalini [6]), method of addition of parameter(s) and generalization (Mudholkar and Srivastava [7]; Marshall and Olkin [8]; Shaw and Buckley [9]), method of compounding the continuous univariate distributions and the discrete univariate distributions (Adamidis and Loukas [10]), method based on generators (Eugene et al. [11]; Jones [12]; Cordeiro and de Castro [13]), method based on the composition of densities (Cooray and Ananda [14]) and the Transformed–Transformer method (Alzaatreh et al. [15]; Alzaatreh et al. [16]). Researchers are also encouraged to see ALHussaini and AbdelHamid [17] for a survey on the generation of distribution functions.
The transformed–transformer method previously called the T–X family of distributions (Alzaatreh [15]) and later renamed the T–R{Y} family of distributions (Alzaatreh et al. [16]) has been thought of as the largest family of univariate distributions, in that it includes several families of univariate distributions as special cases. Alzaatreh et al. [16] defined the T–R{Y} system using the following arguments: Suppose T, R, and Y are random variables with respective cumulative distribution function (cdf) F_{T}(x) = P(T ≤ x), F_{R}(x) = P(R ≤ x) and F_{Y}(x) = P(Y ≤ x). Let the corresponding quantile functions be Q_{T}(p), Q_{R}(p) and Q_{Y}(p), where the quantile function is defined as Q_{W}(p) = inf {w : F_{W}(w) ≥ p }, 0 < p < 1. Suppose the corresponding densities of T, R and Y exist and denote them by f_{T}(x), f_{R}(x) and f_{Y}(x). Assume that Tϵ(a, b) and Yϵ(c, d)for − ∞ ≤ a < b ≤ ∞ and− ∞ ≤ c < d ≤ ∞ ,then the T–R{Y} family of distributions was defined by the cdf
The corresponding probability density function (pdf) of the cdf in (1) was given by
The discrete counterpart of univariate probability distributions has also received some attention over the years in the literature. One of the most common families of discrete univariate distributions is the power series family of discrete univariate distributions (Kosambi [18]; Noack [19]; Patil [20]; Patil [21]) defined by the probability mass function (pmf)
where a_{n} ≥ 0 depends only on n, \( C\left(\theta \right)=\sum \limits_{n=1}^{\infty }{a}_n{\theta}^n \) and θ > 0 is such that C(θ) is finite and its first, second and third derivatives are defined and shown by C^{′}(θ), C^{′′}(θ), and C^{′ ′ ′}(θ). Observe that the pmf in (3) is truncated at zero and could be generalized to a zeroinflated one (Patil, [21]). In Table 1, some members of the power series family of distributions (truncated at zero) defined by (3) such as the Poisson, geometric, binomial and logarithmic distributions are presented alongside their respective a_{n}, C(θ), C^{′}(θ), C^{′′}(θ), and C^{′ ′ ′}(θ).
In this paper, the compounding of the T–R {Y} family of univariate distributions and the power series family of discrete univariate distributions is carried out. We shall present how the new family is constructed, examine the general mathematical properties of the new family, show how parameters of the new family can be estimated using the maximum likelihood method as well as define and apply a special member of the new family to a real data set.
Construction of the T–R {Y} power series family of distributions
Let X_{1}, X_{2}, …, X_{n} be independent and identically distributed (iid) random variables constituting a sample of size n from the T–R {Y} family of distributions as defined in (1). Let X_{(1)}, X_{(2)}, …, X_{(N)} be the corresponding order statistic of the random sample. From the theory of order statistics, the cdf of first order statistic X_{(1)} for a given N = n is expressed as
Suppose N is a discrete random variable and follows the power series distribution in (3), the marginal cdf of X_{(1)} can be written as
Thus, the cdf of the T–R {Y}–power series (T–R {Y}–PS) family of distributions is given by
A physical interpretation of the family of models in (4) is as follows: consider that the failure of a system, device, product, or component occurs due to the presence of an unknown number, say N, of initial defects of the same kind, which can be identifiable only after causing the failure and repaired perfectly. If X_{i} denotes the time to the failure of the device due to the ith defect, for i ≥ 1, such that each X_{i} follows the T–R {Y} distribution in (1), suppose N is discrete and follows a power series distribution in (3), then the distribution of the random variable X_{(1)} which is the time of first failure is the distribution in (4).
The pdf corresponding to (4) is obtained by differentiating (4) w.r.t x and it is given by
The survival and hazard functions of the T–R {Y}–PS family of distributions are given respectively by
Some subfamilies of the T–R{Y}—PS family of distributions namely: T–R {Y}—binomial (T–R{Y}–B) distribution, T–R {Y}–Poisson (T–R{Y}–P) distribution, T–R {Y}—geometric (T–R{Y}–G) distribution and the T–R {Y}–logarithmic (T–R{Y}–L) distribution are defined in Table 2 by their cdfs. In Table 3, five standardized distributions of the random variable Y are presented alongside their various quantile functions Q_{Y}(p) and the corresponding support of the random variable T which is needed to make (1) a valid cdf. These standardized distributions include the standard exponential, logistic, extreme value, log logistic, and uniform distributions. The use of standardized distributions is to reduce the number of parameters in the T–R{Y}–PS distributions. For practical purposes and when highly necessary, these standardized distributions can be replaced with their nonstandardized versions.
In Tables 4, 5, 6, and 7, different T–R{Y}–B, T–R{Y}–G, T–R{Y}–L, and T–R{Y}–P distributions are presented respectively for different choices of Q_{Y}(p) in Table 3.
General mathematical properties of the T–R {Y} power series family of distributions
Some useful statistical properties of the new family are presented. We begin by looking at some limiting distributions as contained in Propositions 1 and 2.
Limiting distributions and some useful representations
Proposition 1:
The T–R{Y} distribution defined by (1) is a limiting case of the T – R{Y} − PS family of distributions defined in (4) when θ → 0^{+}.
Proof:
Applying\( C\left(\theta \right)=\sum \limits_{n=1}^{\infty }{a}_n{\theta}^n \), one readily obtains
Considering θ → 0^{+}, we have
Evaluating using standard procedure gives
which is the cdf of the T – R {Y} distribution defined by (1).
Proposition 2:
For Q_{Y}(F_{R}(x)) = x and θ → 0^{+}, the T – R{Y} − PS family of distributions defined in (4) reduces to the distribution of the random variable T.
Proof:
The proof follows directly and explicitly from substituting x for Q_{Y}(F_{R}(x)) in (1) and the proof of Proposition 1.
Proposition 3:
The pdf of the T – R{Y} − PS family of distributions can be expressed as linear combination of density of the first order statistic of the T – R{Y} distribution as
where \( {f}_{X_{x_{(1)}}}\left(x;n\right) \) is the pdf of \( {X}_{(1)}=\min {\left\{\ {X}_i\right\}}_{i=1}^n \)
Proof:
Observe that\( {C}^{\prime}\left(\theta \right)=\sum \limits_{i=1}^{\infty }n{a}_n{\theta}^{n1} \). Using (5), one readily obtains
and \( {f}_{X_{x_{(1)}}}\left(x;n\right)=n{f}_X(x){\left[1{F}_T\left({Q}_Y\left({F}_R(x)\right)\right),\right]}^{n1} \). Hence, the proof.
Quantiles and moments
The quantile function and moments of a probability distribution provide the theoretical base upon which many statistical properties of a distribution are assessed with. The quantile function in particular is very useful in Monte Carlo simulations since it helps in producing simulated random variates for any distribution, especially when it is in closed form.
Theorem 1:
The quantile function Q(p) of the T – R{Y} − PS family of distributions is given by
where C^{−1}(.) is the inverse of C(.)
Proof:
The result in (8) is obtained by solving the equation F_{T – R{Y} − PS}(Q(p)) = p for Q(p).
Corollary 1:
Random samples can be simulated from the T – R{Y} − PS family of distributions by making use of the relation
where X is a T – R{Y} − PS random variable and U, a uniform random variable on the interval (0, 1).
Proof:
The proof follows by substituting U for p in (8), where U is a uniform random variable on the interval (0, 1).
An expression for the rth noncentral moments of the T – R{Y} − PS family of distributions random variable follows from Proposition 3. The rth noncentral moments of the T – R{Y} − PS family of distributions random variable X is given by
where \( E\left({X}_{(1)}^r\right) \) is the rth noncentral moment of the first order statistic of a T–R{Y} random variable. Thus the rth noncentral moments of the T – R{Y} − PS family of distributions can be expressed as a linear combination of the rth noncentral moments of the first order statistics of the T – R{Y} distribution.
The moment generating function (mgf) of the T – R{Y} − PS family of distributions is defined by
Using Proposition 3, the mgf can be expressed as
Thus the mgf of the T – R{Y} − PS family of distributions can be expressed as a linear combination of the mgf of the first order statistics of the T – R{Y} distribution.
Order statistics
Order statistics are among the most essential tools in nonparametric statistics and inference. Their importance is highly visible in the problems of estimation and hypotheses tests in a variety of ways. Their moments play an important role in quality control testing and reliability, where an analyst needs to predict the failure of future components or items based on the times of a few observed early failures. These predictors are most of the time based on moments of order statistics.
Theorem 2:
Let X_{1}, X_{2}, …, X_{m} be a random sample of size m from the T – R{Y} − PS family of distributions and suppose X_{1 : m} < X_{2 : m} < … < X_{m : m} denote the corresponding order statistics. The pdf of the k^{th} order statistic can be expressed as
where B(., .) is the complete beta function.
and \( {f}_{X_{x_{(1)}}}\left(x;n+m+jk+r+1\right) \) denote the pdf of \( {X}_{(1)}=\min {\left\{\ {X}_i\right\}}_{i=1}^{n+m+jk+r+1}. \)
Proof:
From definition, the pdf of the kth order statistic of the T – R{Y} − PS family of distributions can be written as
Using the binomial expansion formula, one readily obtains
Substituting into (13) gives
Substituting (4) and (5) into (14) gives
Now consider the term
where b_{0} = 1, b_{n} = a_{n + 1}/a_{1} for n = 1, 2, 3, ….
Using the identity
(see. Gradshteyn and Ryzhik [23]) for a positive integer m + j − k, one can write
Consequently,
where d_{m + j − k, 0} = 1 and the coefficients for t ≥ 1 can be obtained from the recurrence equation
An expression for C^{′}[θ(1 − F_{T}(Q_{Y}(F_{R}(x))))] can also be defined. In particular,
Thus,
where b_{0} = 1, b_{r} = a_{r + 1}/a_{1 }for r = 1, 2, 3, … Inserting (16) and (17) in (15) gives
hence
where
and
\( {f}_{X_{x_{(1)}}}\left(x;n+m+jk+r+1\right) \) denote the pdf of \( {X}_{(1)}=\min {\left\{\ {X}_i\right\}}_{i=1}^{n+m+jk+r+1}. \)
One readily observes that the pdf of the T – R{Y} − PS family order statistics is an infinite linear combination of the density of\( \kern0.5em {X}_{(1)}=\min {\left\{\ {X}_i\right\}}_{i=1}^{n+m+jk+r+1} \), where the quantities δ_{r, n, m, k, j} depend only on the power series family.
The sth moment of the T – R{Y} − PS family kth order statistics is given as
Thus,
where
A characterization for the new family
Following a dual concept in statistical mechanics, Shannon [24] introduced the probabilistic definition of entropy. The Shannon entropy which is sometimes referred to as a measure of uncertainty plays an essential role in information theory. To measure randomness or uncertainty, the entropy of a random variable comes handy since it can be defined in terms of its probability distribution. Suppose X is a continuous random variable with density function f. Then, the Shannon entropy of X is defined by
Another powerful method often employed in the field of probability and statistics and closely related to the Shannon entropy is the “maximum entropy method” pioneered by Jaynes [25]. The method considers a family of density functions
where T_{1}(X), …, T_{m}(X) are absolutely integrable functions with respect to f, and T_{0}(X) = α_{0} = 1. In the continuous case, the maximum entropy principle suggests deriving the unknown density function of the random variable X by the model that maximizes the Shannon entropy (19) subject to the information constraints defined in the family \( \mathbbm{F} \) (see. Shore and Johnson [26]). The maximum entropy method has been used for the characterization of several standard probability distributions; see for example, Zografos and Balakrishnan [27].
The maximum entropy distribution is the density of the family\( \mathbbm{F} \), denoted f^{ME}, obtained as the solution of the optimization problem
As demonstrated by Jaynes [25], the maximum entropy distribution f^{ME} determined by the constrained maximization problem depicted above “is the only unbiased assignment we can make; to use any other would amount to arbitrary assumption of information which by hypothesis we do not have” To provide a maximum entropy characterization for the T – R{Y} − PS family, a derivation of important constraints is undertaken.
Proposition 4:
If X is a random variable with density (5) and Z follows a T – R{Y} distribution with density given by (2), the following constraints hold
Proof:
The proof is trivial and hence it is omitted.
Theorem 3:
The density function f_{T – R{Y} − PS}(.) given in (5) for the random variable X following the T – R{Y} − PS family of distributions, is the unique solution of the optimization problem
under the constraints C1 and C2 given in Proposition 4.
Proof:
Suppose v(.) is a pdf which satisfies the constraints C1 and C2. The KullbackLeibler divergence between the densities v and f_{T – R{Y} − PS} is
Following Cover and Thomas [28], one obtains
Let Z have the pdf given by (2). From the definition of f_{T – R{Y} − PS} and based on the constraints C1 and C2, the following result holds:
Since the density v satisfies the constraints C1 and C2.
Thus,
hence,
with equality if and only if v(x) = f_{T – R{Y} − PS}(x) for all x except for a null measure set. This proves Theorem 3.
Corollary 2:
The Shannon entropy of the T – R{Y} − PS family of distributions is given by
Proof:
The result follows from (20).
The mode of the family
The mode(s) of the T – R{Y} − PS family of distributions can be obtained as the solution of the equation
for x. It follows that the mode(s) of a T – R{Y} − PS distribution can be obtained by solving for x in the equation
Mean deviations of the family
The dispersion and the spread in a population from the center are often measured by the deviation from the mean, and the deviation from the median. The mean absolute deviation about the mean, D(μ), and the mean absolute deviation about the median, D(M), for the new family are defined as
and
respectively, where μ = E(X) and M = Q(0.5). Consequently,
Thus,
Also,
Thus,
Remark: Many results obtained so far can be determined numerically by employing any symbolic computing software such as MATLAB, MATHEMATICA, and R. The infinity limit in the sums can be substituted by a large number for applied purposes.
Maximum likelihood estimation of the parameters of the new family
Suppose ξ is a p × 1 vector containing all the parameters of the T – R{Y} distribution, for a complete random sample x_{1}, x_{2}, …, x_{n} of size n from the T – R{Y} − PS family, the total loglikelihood function is given by
Let Θ = (θ ξ)^{T} be the unknown parameter vector of the T – R{Y} − PS family, the associated score function is given by
where \( \frac{\partial \ell }{\partial \theta }\ \mathrm{and}\frac{\partial \ell }{\partial \xi } \) are given by
The maximum likelihood estimate of Θ, \( \hat{\Theta}, \) can be obtained by solving the nonlinear systems of equations, U(Θ) = 0. Since the resulting systems of equations are not in closed form, the solutions can be found numerically using some specialized numerical iterative scheme such as the NewtonRaphson type algorithms, which can be implemented on several computing software like R, SAS, MATHEMATICA, and MATLAB.
For interval estimation of the parameters of the T – R{Y} − PS family, one would require the Fisher information matrix (FIM) given by the (1 + p) × (1 + p) symmetric matrix
where p is the number of parameter(s) in the T – R{Y} distribution and
The total FIM, I(Θ), can be approximated by
For real data, \( \boldsymbol{J}\left(\hat{\Theta}\right) \) is obtained after the maximum likelihood estimate of Θ is gotten, which implies the convergence of the iterative numerical procedure involved in finding such estimate.
Given that \( \hat{\Theta} \) is the maximum likelihood estimate of Θ and under the conditions that are fulfilled for the parameters Θ in the interior of the parameter space but not on the boundary, it follows that \( \sqrt{n}\left(\hat{\Theta}\Theta \right)\overset{d}{\to }{N}_{1+p}\left(\mathbf{0},{\boldsymbol{I}}^{\mathbf{1}}\left(\Theta \right)\right), \) where I^{−1}(Θ) is the inverse of the expected FIM. The asymptotic behavior is still valid if I^{−1}(Θ) is replaced by\( {\boldsymbol{J}}^{\mathbf{1}}\left(\hat{\Theta}\right) \). The multivariate normal distribution with zero mean vector 0 and covariance matrix I^{−1}(Θ) is used to construct confidence intervals for the T – R{Y} − PS family parameters. The approximate 100(1 − α)% twosided confidence interval for the parameters θ and ξ are given by
respectively, where \( {\boldsymbol{I}}_{\theta \theta}^{1}\left(\hat{\Theta}\right)\ \mathrm{and}\ {\boldsymbol{I}}_{\xi \xi}^{1}\left(\hat{\Theta}\right) \)are diagonal elements of \( {\boldsymbol{I}}^{\mathbf{1}}\left(\hat{\Theta}\right) \) and Z_{α/2} is the upper (α/2)^{th} percentile of a standard normal distribution.
A specific member from the new family: the Gumbel–Weibull {logistic}–Poisson (GUWELOP) distribution
Taking T, R, and Y as random variables following the Gumbel, Weibull and logistic distributions, respectively, AlAqtash et al. [29] defined the Gumbel–Weibull {logistics} (GW) distribution by the cdf and pdf expressed respectively as
Taking the power series distribution as the Poisson distribution with properties as specified in Table 1 and substituting (26) and (27) into (4) and (5), we define the Gumbel – Weibull {logistic} Poisson (GUWELOP) distribution by the cdf and pdf given respectively by
A graph of the pdf of the GUWELOP distribution is shown in Fig. 1. The graph of the pdf reveals that the GUWELOP density can be rightskewed, leftskewed, almost symmetric, and bimodal. To buttress the applicability of members of the new family in modeling complex real life data, the GUWELOP distribution is used to fit a multimodal data set. The data set represents Kevlar 49/epoxy strands failure times data (pressure at 70%) reported in AlAqtash et al. [29] The data are multimodal, platykurtic, and approximately symmetric. (Skewness = 0.1, kurtosis = − 0.79). The data set is given in Table 8. The maximum likelihood method is used to fit the GUWELOP distribution, GW distribution, and the betanormal (BN) distribution (Eugene et al. [11] to the data set. The results of the fit and other summary statistics are presented in Table 9. The graph of the fitted densities alongside the histogram of the data set is shown in Fig. 2.
Results from Table 9 show that the three distributions provided good fits to the data set since all the distributions have high p values of the K–S statistics. However, The GUWELOP distribution has the highest p value and hence provided the best fit to the data. This application suggests the adequacy of the GUWELOP distribution in fitting multimodal data sets.
Summary and conclusion
A new family of probability distributions called the T–R {Y}—power series family of distributions has been introduced in this paper. The new family was realized by compounding the T–R {Y} family of distribution and the power series family. Several mathematical properties of the new family were explored alongside the maximum likelihood method for the estimation of the parameters of the new family. A special member of the new family called the Gumbel–Weibull {logistics} Poisson distribution was defined and applied to a real data set in order to buttress the applicability of members of the new family in fitting real life data sets. Finally, we hope that the new family will attract usage in complex applications in the literature on compounded family of probability distributions.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable
Abbreviations
 AIC:

Akaike Information Criterion
 BN:

beta normal
 cdf:

cumulative distributions function
 GUWELOP:

Gumbel – Weibull {logistic} Poisson
 GW:

Gumbel – Weibull
 K – S:

Kolmogorov –Smirnov
 mgf:

moment generating function
 pdf:

probability density function
 T – R {Y} – B:

T – R {Y} – binomial
 T – R {Y} – G:

T – R {Y} – geometric
 T – R {Y} – L:

T – R {Y} – logarithmic
 T – R {Y} – P:

T – R {Y} – Poisson
References
 1.
K. Pearson: Contribution to the mathematical theory of evolution. II. Skew variation in homogenous material. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London A, 186, (1895), 343 – 414.
 2.
Burr, I.W.: Cumulative frequency functions. Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 13, 215–232 (1942)
 3.
Johnson, N.L.: Systems of frequency curves generated by methods of translation. Biometrika. 36, 149–176 (1949)
 4.
J. W. Tukey: The Practical Relationship Between the Common Transformations of Percentages of Counts and amounts. Technical Report 36. Statistical Techniques Research Group, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, (1960).
 5.
M. Aldeni, C. Lee and F. Famoye: (2017). Families of distributions arising from the quantile of generalized lambda distribution. Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications, (2017), 4:25.
 6.
Azzalini, A.: A class of distributions which includes the normal ones. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics. 12, 171–178 (1985)
 7.
Mudholkar, G.S., Srivastava, D.K.: Exponentiated Weibull family for analyzing bathtub failurerate data. IEEE Transactions on Reliability. 42, 299–302 (1993)
 8.
Marshall, A.W., Olkin, I.: A new method for adding parameter to a family of distributions with application to the exponential and Weibull families. Biometrika. 84, 641–652 (1997)
 9.
W.T. Shaw and I.R. Buckley: The alchemy of probability distributions: Beyond GramCharlier expansions and a skewkurtoticnormal distribution from a rank transmutation map. arXiv:0901.0434[qfin.ST], (2009).
 10.
Adamidis, K., Loukas, S.: A lifetime distribution with decreasing failure rate. Statistics and Probability Letters. 39, 35–42 (1998)
 11.
Eugene, N., Lee, C., Famoye, F.: Betanormal distribution and its applications. Communications in Statistics  Theory & Methods. 31, 497–512 (2002)
 12.
Jones, M.C.: Kumaraswamy’s distribution: A betatype distribution with tractability advantages. Statistical Methodology. 6, 70–81 (2009)
 13.
Cordeiro, G.M., de Castro, M.: A new family of generalized distributions. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation. 81, 883–898 (2011)
 14.
Cooray, K., Ananda, M.M.A.: Modeling actuarial data with a composite lognormalPareto model. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal. 5, 321–334 (2005)
 15.
Alzaatreh, A., Lee, C., Famoye, F.: A new method for generating families of continuous distributions. Metron. 71, 63–79 (2013)
 16.
Alzaatreh, A., Lee, C., Famoye, F.: T – normal family of distributions: a new approach to generalize the normal distribution. Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications. 1, 16 (2014)
 17.
E.K. ALHussaini and AbdelHamid, A.H. Generation of distribution functions: A survey. Journal of Statistics Applications and Probability, 7, (2018), 91 – 103.
 18.
Kosambi, O.D.: Characteristic properties of series distributions. Proceedings of the National Institute of Science, India. 15, 109–113 (1949)
 19.
A. Noack: A class of random variables with discrete distributions. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 21, (1950), 12 7 132.
 20.
G.P. Patil: Contribution to the estimation in a class of discrete distributions. Ph.D Thesis, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, (1961).
 21.
Patil, G.P.: Certain properties of the generalized power series distributions. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics. 14, 179–182 (1962)
 22.
Morais, A., BarretoSouza, W.: A compound class of Weibull and power series distributions. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis. 55, 1410–1425 (2011)
 23.
Gradshteyn, I.S., Ryzhik, I.M.: Tables of Integrals, Series and Products. Academic Press, San Diego (2000)
 24.
Shannon, C.E.: A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal. 27, 379–432 (1948)
 25.
Jaynes, E.T.: Information theory and statistical mechanics. Physical Reviews. 106, 620–630 (1957)
 26.
Shore, J.E., Johnson, R.W.: Axiomatic derivation of the principle of maximum entropy and the principle of minimum crossentropy. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 28, 26–37 (1980)
 27.
Zografos, K., Balakrishnan, N.: On families of betaand generalized gammagenerated distributions and associated inference. Statistical Methodology. 6, 344–368 (2009)
 28.
Cover, T.M., Thomas, J.A.: Elements of Information Theory. John Wiley and Sons, New York (1991)
 29.
AlAqtash, R., Lee, C., Famoye, F.: Gumbel  Weibull distribution: Properties and application. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Method. 13, 201–225 (2014)
Acknowledgements
The authors are sincerely thankful to members of the Statistics Research Group (SRG), University of Benin, Benin city, Nigeria, for useful comments which greatly helped to improve this paper when it was first presented at the Quarterly Seminar of the group.
Funding
The authors declare that they had no funding.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
The authors read and approved the final manuscripts
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Osatohanmwen, P., Oyegue, F.O. & Ogbonmwan, S.M. The T–R {Y} power series family of probability distributions. J Egypt Math Soc 28, 29 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42787020000837
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42787020000837
Keywords
 T − R{Y} family
 Power series family
 Continuous distribution
 Discrete distribution
 Maximum Likelihood estimation
Mathematics Subject Classification
 62B15
 60E05
 62F10
 62N05